Help understanding pressure involving water in two different cylinders

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding hydrostatic pressure and flow resistance in different tank and pipe configurations for moving water. Hydrostatic pressure is determined solely by the depth and density of the fluid, meaning that a 20-foot tall pipe filled with water will exert higher pressure than a 12-foot tank with less water. When considering pipe size, a larger diameter pipe (3 inches) will have less friction and back pressure compared to a smaller diameter pipe (1 inch) for the same flow rate. Thus, using a larger pipe allows for a higher flow rate and reduced resistance. Overall, the configuration and size of the pipes significantly impact the efficiency of water movement in this context.
Branson Sutter
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Please excuse my ignorance. I work for a Natural gas company and have an issue that needs addressed. When gas comes out of the ground it goes into a piece of equipment that separates the water from the gas. The gas goes into a pipeline and the water is dumped into a tank. We are currently trying to figure out which application would have less resistance. So the question is would it require more pressure to inject the water into the bottom of a 12ft wide tank with 12ft of water in it, or to run a 3inch pipe up the side of the 20ft tank and dump the water in at the top. One person claims that the hydrostatic pressure will be higher in the 20ft 3inch section of pipe when full of water vs the 12ft wide tank with 10 ft of water. I don't know enough about this but I figure there are multiple measures of pressure/resistance involved so figured I would ask someone smarter than myself. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Branson Sutter said:
One person claims that the hydrostatic pressure will be higher in the 20 ft 3 inch section of pipe when full of water vs the 12 ft wide tank with 10 ft of water.
That person is correct. Only the depth and density of a fluid determines its hydrostatic pressure.
The area of fluid container has no effect, the hydrostatic pressure at a given difference in elevation is the same for a giant lake as it is for 0.10 inch diameter tube.
 
JBA said:
That person is correct. Only the depth and density of a fluid determines its hydrostatic pressure.
The area of fluid container has no effect, the hydrostatic pressure at a given difference in elevation is the same for a giant lake as it is for 0.10 inch diameter tube.

Thank you! the water is being moved to the tank by the pressure from the well. Would running smaller pipe, lowering the volume of water, require less pressure to displace any given amount of water into the tank?
 
Branson Sutter said:
Thank you! the water is being moved to the tank by the pressure from the well. Would running smaller pipe, lowering the volume of water, require less pressure to displace any given amount of water into the tank?

I think maybe a better way of asking would be. Is there more resistance, from friction or any other source, to push 10 gallons of water through a 3 inch line full of water vs a 1 inch line full of water the same length
 
No, it is exactly the reverse, the larger 3" pipe will have less flowing friction back pressure and a higher flow rate for a given pipe inlet pressure than the 1" pipe.

For any given flow rate (gpm etc) through a pipe, as the velocity of the fluid flowing through the pipe increases, the pipe's flowing backpressure increases; so, the pipe with the largest inside area will have the lowest flow velocity and therefore the lowest flowing backpressure.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top