Help understanding the solution to this fraction problem.

  • Thread starter Thread starter limac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
limac
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Please see the attachment.

I really don't understand what the M/7 and the L/13 represents. How did he(authors) logically derive to that? And also, I don't understand how finding the value in-between M/7 and L/13 (M+L/20) helps them come up with the solution and the proof.

Thank you,
limac
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Where is the attachment?
 
Here, How about this?
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    23.7 KB · Views: 430
Given an integer k from 1 to 6, and an integer l from 1 to 12, k/7 and l/13 are positions of a red mark and a green mark, respectively (where the stick goes from 0 to 1). The idea is that in between any red mark and any green mark, there is a point at (k + l)/20 where the stick is cut (since the stick is cut at 1/20 intervals).
 
adriank,

Alright, so k and l are representing anyone valid mark at a time on the stick. And (k+l)/20 is the point in-between any two of the respective red and green marks, right?

Now, it is making sense to me. I was very confused about what k/7 and l/13 meant.

Thank you very much for your time. :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top