Help: want to find an analytical soln to this =p

  • Thread starter Thread starter mkkrnfoo85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analytical
mkkrnfoo85
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
So, here's the motivation to my problem:

I have this following equation:

P(u) = \frac{u^n}{1+u+u^2+...+u^n}

, 'n' being a given constant.

I figured out that I could simplify the power series on the denominator, and get a better solution for P(u):

P(u) = \frac{u^n-u^{n+1}}{1 - u^{n+1}}Now, I am interested in P(u) = x, and 'x' is a number between 0 and 1.
What I have been struggling with is finding an analytical solution for u(x).
To make it more clear, I would like to know what 'u' will equal, for a given 'x' value, and a known 'n'.

I've tried a lot of different approaches, but I just can't seem to come up with an analytical solution for u(x).

One attempt and where I get stuck: u^n + u^{n+1}(x-1) = xAny help would be appreciated. I would like to be enlightened. =p

Thanks,

Mark
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am inclined to say there is no analytical solution for it, though I have no proof, just instinct.
 
You can use the inverse function theorem along with http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/DerivativeOfInverseFunction.html to find the derivative of u(x) from what you have (x(u)).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top