[HELP]What is the difference between renormalized mass and the running mass

piggy1983
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between renormalized mass and the running mass? And physical mass,pole mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"renormalized mass" (also called "physical mass" sometimes) is the mass parameter AFTER you have subtracted your UV divergences.

"running mass" is a funny, and somewhat misleading, term. It is a mass that is a function of the energy. Roughly speaking, when you compute cross sections, you often find your answer involves logarithms that are large (for example, log(Q/m) where Q is the CM energy and m is the mass - if you're talking about scattering 1 GeV mass particles at the LHC, for example, this is a large ratio). These large logs can cause trouble, since if they get too large, they detroy perturbation theory! So using something called "Renormalization group" we can sum up these logs into functions we call "running couplings" (including mass).

As a simple example of how this works, think of calculating something in perturbation theory. You get an answer:

1+x+x^2+x^3

Now this is perturbation theory, so you know this should not make sense if x > 1. But you might also recognize this series as (1-x)^{-1}, which is valid for MUCH larger x (!) So you "resum" the series into this form and your calcuation will be valid for larger x. These resummed quantities are called "running couplings", but really they're just factors in cross sections and lifetimes.

Pole mass: this is a SPECIFIC renormalization scheme where you define your renormalized mass to be the place where the propogator (p^2-m_{\rm pole}^2)^{-1} blows up.

Hope that helps!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top