Help with 2nd moment of inertia

AI Thread Summary
When determining whether to use Ixx or Iyy from the sections table for a beam with its y-y axis in the plane of the paper, clarity on the axis definitions is crucial. The discussion emphasizes the importance of providing additional information to ensure accurate guidance. It also notes that the terms "second moment of area" and "moment of inertia" may be confused, as they relate to different concepts. Variations in axis definitions across codes, textbooks, and countries can lead to misunderstandings. Clear communication about the context is essential for proper application of these principles.
Einsti
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If a beam's y-y axis lies in the plane of the paper, do I use Ixx or Iyy from sections table?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einsti said:
If a beam's y-y axis lies in the plane of the paper, do I use Ixx or Iyy from sections table?
Yes.

You're going to have to provide more information.

Please use the HW template per PF Rules. We don't provide hit and run help here.
 
If the tables have units of length to the 4th power, I think you are referring to the second moment of area, rather than the moment of inertia. Over the past 50 years, the x y and z axes associated with the longitudinal and cross sections of a beam have been variously defined by different codes, tables, textbooks and countries. You have to be clear in each case what you mean. What people mean by 'the usual configuration' can be very different in another context.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top