Help with a geometric interpretation of the following

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the geometric interpretation of the Cauchy-Riemann equations, specifically the condition (du/dx)(du/dy) + (dv/dx)(dv/dy) = 0. This condition indicates that the gradient vectors of the real part u(x,y) and the imaginary part v(x,y) of a complex function w(z) are orthogonal. To visualize this, one can construct normal vectors to the curves defined by u(x,y)=c1 and v(x,y)=c2, which are perpendicular to their tangent lines. The orthogonality of these gradients signifies that the complex function is differentiable and thus analytic. Understanding this relationship is crucial for studying the properties of analytic functions in complex analysis.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
When I use d, I am referring to a partial derivative here.

So where w(z)=u(x,y) + iv(x,y), and the derivative of w(z) exists, I have shown that

(du/dx)(du/dy) + (dv/dx)(dv/dy) = 0

But I have to give a geometric interpretation of this which is somewhat confusing to me. I am not sure what do here. Should I start by constructing vectors normal to the curve u(x,y)=c1 and v(x,y)=c2? And if so, how do I do this? Thanks for reading and wasting your time on me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. You may consider the vectors normal to the curve u(x,y)=c1 and v(x,y)=c2. To construct normal vectors you just take the gradients of the functions u(x,y) and v(x,y). The condition (du/dx)(du/dy) + (dv/dx)(dv/dy) = 0 means that the two sets of normal vectors are orthogonal. What does this say about the curves u(x,y)=c1 and v(x,y)=c2 themselves?
 


The equation (du/dx)(du/dy) + (dv/dx)(dv/dy) = 0 represents the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which are necessary conditions for a complex function to be analytic. In geometric terms, this equation can be interpreted as the orthogonality of the gradient vectors of the real and imaginary parts of the complex function.

To understand this, let's start by considering the real and imaginary parts of the complex function w(z). The real part, u(x,y), can be thought of as a surface in 3-dimensional space, with the x and y axes representing the independent variables and the z-axis representing the dependent variable. Similarly, the imaginary part, v(x,y), can also be thought of as a surface in 3-dimensional space.

Now, the partial derivatives (du/dx) and (du/dy) represent the slopes of the surface u(x,y) in the x and y directions respectively. Similarly, (dv/dx) and (dv/dy) represent the slopes of the surface v(x,y) in the x and y directions.

The Cauchy-Riemann equations state that these slopes must be perpendicular to each other, or in other words, the gradient vectors of u(x,y) and v(x,y) must be orthogonal. This can be visualized by constructing vectors normal to the curves u(x,y)=c1 and v(x,y)=c2, which would be perpendicular to the tangent lines of these curves.

By satisfying the Cauchy-Riemann equations, we ensure that the complex function w(z) is differentiable, and hence analytic. This is important in complex analysis, as analytic functions have many useful properties that make them easier to study and work with.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top