Help with a Physics/Calculus Problem - 40 yard dash

  • Thread starter Thread starter dcebb2001
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To analyze an athlete's 40-yard dash performance, the discussion focuses on calculating velocity and acceleration using a cubic polynomial derived from distance and time data. The polynomial equation allows for forecasting performance at distances beyond the recorded splits, specifically at 45 yards. The user seeks to determine maximum velocity and the point of greatest acceleration, typically occurring in the initial 10-20 yards. Additionally, the discussion emphasizes evaluating how quickly the athlete decelerates after reaching peak speed, which is indicative of stamina. The use of calculus, specifically derivatives, is suggested to derive velocity and acceleration from the polynomial function, with the goal of applying this analysis across multiple athletes in Excel.
dcebb2001
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Help with a Physics/Calculus Problem -- 40 yard dash

I have a physics problem that I just cannot solve.

I am trying to determine the velocity and acceleration for an athlete who is running a 40 yard dash.

What I know are the distances and split times for each player.

For example, a certain Player A may run a 40 yard dash with the following split times:

Distance / Time

0 yards / 0 seconds
10 yards / 1.78 seconds
20 yards / 2.92 seconds
40 yards / 5.13 seconds

Now I know I can graph the distance vs. time and use a cubic function with an order of 3 to get a really nice smooth line which allows me to "predict" or forecast what the time would be for this player at a certain distance or vice versus.

I also know that this polynomial curve gives me an equation of:

f(x) = 7.7083333E-05*x^3-0.0055125*x^2+0.22541667*x-4.5536491E-18

The R-Squared value of course is 1.


Now, I want to be able to use this distance v. time graph to determine the VELOCITY for this run along this nice smooth polynomial line. I know that I can take the average of the distances between the splits to get velocity, but I want to be more precise than that. The reason being is that I want to determine the velocity for Player A at 45 yards. In other words I want to FORECAST what his velocity would be at a distance of 45 yards if it was given that the player kept running.

I also want to be able to determine what the player's maximum velocity was during the run.

Next, I want to determine the ACCELERATION level during the course of the run. Most players will show the largest amount of acceleration during the first 10-20 yards. I want to know when that occurs given the nice polynomial fit I have.

Finally, I want to determine how fast the player falls off after attaining his top velocity. This would measure the player's stamina. In other words, the longer you stay at top speed, the more stamina you have. The faster you drop off and begin to decelerate, the less stamina you have. We can use the velocity and/or acceleration curves derived to figure this out as well.


I would love to be able to find a way to do this for several players in excel. Since I know all of the distances and split times, is this possible? Can I get a smooth line for velocity and acceleration in order to make forecasts using a cubic fit?

PLEASE HELP ME!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you've got your equation fit, then finding velocity and acceleration would just be calculating the first and second derivatives of the equation and evaluating same at given distances from the starting line. The tools of the calculus should enable you to locate the points at which velocity and acceleration are maximum.
 


Change f(x) to x(t). Then v = dx/dt and a = d2x/dt2, i.e do as steamking suggests.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top