Help with accelration due to gravity experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on measuring gravitational acceleration (g) through freefall experiments, with recorded times ranging from 0.53 to 0.70 seconds for various distances. A reaction time of 0.5 seconds is mentioned, but it's clarified that this should be treated as a systematic error rather than an uncertainty, as it can be minimized with careful timing techniques. Recommendations include conducting multiple measurements for each height to better assess uncertainty and referencing Galileo's historical methods for inspiration. The importance of accurately measuring time and distance, along with their associated uncertainties, is emphasized for reliable results. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of experimental physics and the need for precise measurement techniques.
keil
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey, I'm doing a science project thing, and I'm measuring g. One method was freefall, I got times of

0.53
0.55
0.57
0.60
0.63
0.65
0.66
0.67
0.68
0.70

For distances of 0.1m intervals, starting at 1.5m, and ending at 2.4m However, uncertainties are confusing me, reaction time I'm taking as 0.5s, so there's uncertainty of between 94% and 71%, depending of course on the time, anyhoo, to calculate g you use 2s/t squared, so you double uncertainty, and combine them, and it's really confusing, so can anyone help?

(i'm aware this post sort of lacks clarity, so if you need me to explain anyu bit again please ask)

Thanks in advannce for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh, and I need to find overall uncertainty in g, sorry, forgot that bit.
 
keil,

If your reaction time is really 0.5 seconds, then it's not an uncertainty; it's a systematic error that has to be subtracted from each of your measured times. But I doubt that the error is anywhere near half a second. Reaction time is the time it would take you to stop your clock after seeing or hearing something that you had no way of anticipating.

Imagine doing the experiment with your eyes closed. You drop the ball and start the clock at the same time (you should be able to make those pretty close to simultaneous). Then when you hear the ball hit, you stop the watch. The difference between the time when you hear the ball hit and when you actually stop the watch is your reaction time. And that might be around half a second. But when you're watching the ball fall, you can do a lot better. Make five or ten measurements of time for each of your heights. The variation in each set of results gives you the uncertainty in the time for that height.

By the way, around 400 years ago, Galileo was the first person to do this kind of experiment. He had the same problem you're having getting accurate values for time (actually he had it a lot worse than you do, because all he had for measuring time was a pendulum!). He invented a very ingenious way to solve the problem that you could probably use. See if you can find what it was with a google.com search on Galileo.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums keil!

How did you measure the times? the distances?

Any experiment which has an objective of finding "the overall uncertainty in g" will need to include a discussion of the means of measuring time and distance, and the uncertainties of those measurements.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top