Help with Article: Life as we don't know it.

  • Thread starter Thread starter olek1991
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article Life
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the exploration of silicon and ammonia-based life forms as alternatives to carbon and water-based life. The initial proposal suggests a chemical reaction involving silicon and ammonia, aiming to replace carbon and water in biological processes. However, participants point out that the proposed reaction is incomplete and lacks key components, such as nitrogen. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of silicon-based life due to the weaker Si-Si bonds compared to C-C bonds, which limits the complexity of potential biological molecules. Additionally, the gaseous nature of ammonia at standard pressure poses challenges for life, although higher planetary pressures could allow ammonia to exist as a liquid. The discussion emphasizes the importance of carbon's ability to form long chains, which is crucial for the complexity of organic life, suggesting that silicon may not be a viable substitute under most conditions. Participants encourage sharing a complete draft for further feedback on the concept.
olek1991
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Ok I'm currently exploring other forms of life, mainly silicone and ammonia based life
I found out they can replace carbon and water in our system but I'm a bit stuck on the fact if they can replace both.

So we would have SI instead of C and NH3 instead H2O.
I think that assimilation (12H2O(l) + 6CO2(g)+ light→ C6H12O6 (glucose)(s) + 6O2(g) + 6H2O(l))
would become something like: Si3H4(s) → 3Si(NH)2(s) + H2(g)

This would make it rather tricky to live since your breathing H2 and that's a bit too flammable

So I need someone to help me work this and some more problems out, if your interested please reply. And Id also love someone to read the whole thing and give some constructive feedback.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Your proposed reaction is incomplete. You're missing two nitrogens; is N2(g) supposed to be a product?

A few other thoughts: I don't know much about the biology side of this, but I know for a fact that Si-Si bonds are weaker than C-C bonds. I suppose this idea is plausible, from a chemical standpoint, but it's unlikely that silicon based life would form over carbon based. It may also be a problem that NH3 is a gas, while H2O is a liquid. The courses the reactions would have to take would be very different when you're looking at solid-gas reactions. I feel like water (or some liquid) would be necessary at some point before you start forming really complex compounds like amino acids, or some form of them anyway.
 
Ah thanks for pointing that out, I forgot to add ammonia (the water replacement(I should have said that x.x)) this should do the job;
2NH3(l) + Si3H4(s) → 3Si(NH)2(s) + H8(g)

It may also be a problem that NH3 is a gas, while H2O is a liquid.
The main objection is that the liquid range of ammonia is -44 degrees centigrade and that that is too low for any life to thrive. This true but the liquid range is specified by the pressure of the planet which on Earth is 1atm but for example on Jupiter or Venus where the pressure is 60atm the boiling point is ammonia becomes 98 degrees centigrade instead of minus -33 giving it a liquid range of 175 degrees

So that shouldn't give a problem, how much weaker is SI tho?
According to my chem teacher it can replace the C in all Organic substances.
And it doen't need to be able to form over C just form instead of C because the planet is too hostile for C-life.

Maybe I should post my entire draft so it will be easier to find the flaws?
 
I feel I should point out a flaw in the idea of silicon based life. The reason why life as we do know it is "carbon based" is because of carbon's exceptional ability to catenate (i.e. to make long chains with itself). This is how large organic molecules can form with ease. For example, the rings of C-C bonds in all the residues in the amino acids that form proteins, and all fatty material. From what I remember, it's far less thermodynamically stable for silicon to catenate - the highest possible chain for silicon is only about 11 or 12 Si - Si bonds long, although even the disilane, Si2H6 is difficult to obtain.

(Above figures taken from Main Group Chemistry by A.G. Massey)
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top