Help with Banked Curves w/Friction Can someone show me how?

  • Thread starter Thread starter celticsthree4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves
AI Thread Summary
To solve banked curve problems with friction, start by drawing a free body diagram and applying Newton's Second Law. The maximum velocity (Vmax) can be calculated using the formula that incorporates the static friction coefficient and the bank angle. It's recommended to first understand the forces on a curve without banking and friction before adding complexity. Many users suggest working through simpler scenarios to build a solid foundation before tackling more challenging problems. Understanding these principles will help clarify the calculations involved in banked curves with friction.
celticsthree4
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Could anyone explain to me how to go about solving these problems?
Example:
A Car is driven around a circe with a radius of 200m, bank angle 10 degrees. The static frictional coefficient is 0.60. Calculate the maximum velocity the car can travel (Vmax).
Please help!

I did this, but am not sure it is the correct way:(.6 + tan10)/(1-.6tan10) = v^2/rg

v^2 = 1703.36

v = 41/ 27 m/s

Is this correct or am I totally off??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the impatience, but I have a lot of problems like this, and I don't really understand this type, so could anyone explain it?

Thanks!
 
Start with the free body diagram and apply Newton's 2nd Law.
 
celtics, I can't tell exactly HOW you got what you did,
but generally speaking, the best approach is to
choose components parallel to the acceleration and to the velocity if possible
(here you can, so don't make a component parallel the slope)
Most folks don't do friction on banked curves as their first problem of the night!
 
Last edited:
try Vmax on the curve without banking and friction first, it's much easier resolve the forces. Then try with the banking...then add friction.
 
I agree with cyclovenom and lightgrav.

See question 23 on

http://www.physics247.com/members/physics40/015.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top