Help with Calculating Planet's Orbital Period

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks assistance in calculating the orbital period of a hypothetical small planet located eight times further from the Sun than Earth. The discussion revolves around applying Kepler's Third Law, which states that the square of the orbital period (T) is directly proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis (R) of its orbit. By substituting R = 8 AU into the formula T^2 ∝ R^3, the user derives that T^2 equals 512, leading to T being approximately 16√2 years. The calculation is confirmed as correct, concluding the discussion with a sense of accomplishment.
tinksy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
hi, could someone please help me with this problem??

If a small planet were discovered with a distance from the sun eight times that of the Earth, what would you predict for its period in (Earth) years. (i.e. how many times longer would it take to go round the sun than the Earth does.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i will not give you the answer straight away, but here's the hint---
get orbital velocity v as a function of radius r

dynamics of the system(*) :

from Newton's second law and law of gravitation,
(m*v^2)/R = (G*M*m)/R^2


get v(r) and substitute in the kinemetical relation which you got correct,that is, T=2(pi)r/v

this will give you T(r) which is usually called "kepler's third law".


*assumption: all orbits are circular

justification : though the orbits that actually elliptical ,the eccentricity is very small.(dont worry if you don't understand this,take this as a side remark).

cheers :smile:
 
Last edited:
thanks teddy...

could u tell me if I'm right?

i've used kepler's law T^2 (directly proportional to) R^3
so if R = 8R (as for Earth, R = 1AU so for the planet, R = 8AU)
kepler's law: R^3/T^2 = 1
therefore, T^2 = 8^3/1
so T = (root)512 = 16(root)2 ...? is that correct?
 
yup,its right.
bye :smile:
 
yaaaaaay! thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top