Help with Cauchy-Schwartz Inequality proof.

  • Thread starter Thread starter faust9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, with initial attempts involving algebraic manipulation of the inequality and expressions for dot products. The user struggles with a specific step in their proof, indicating a potential error in earlier calculations. They later refine their approach by relating the inequality to the cosine of the angle between vectors, concluding that the proof holds true since cosine values are bounded between -1 and 1. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing perfect squares in the proof process, leading to a successful resolution. Overall, the thread emphasizes collaborative problem-solving in mathematical proofs.
faust9
Messages
690
Reaction score
2
Help with Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality proof.

Argh!

I've been playing around with this and I can't get it...

Here's what I have thus far:

Given \mid u \cdot v \mid \leq \parallel u \parallel \parallel v \parallel

(u \cdot v)^2 \leq (u_1^2 + u_2^2)(v_1^2 + v_2^2)

(u_1v_1+u_2v_2)^2 \leq (u_1^2 + u_2^2)(v_1^2 + v_2^2)

(u_1v_1+u_2v_2)^2 \leq (u_1^2 + u_2^2)(v_1^2 + v_2^2)

u_1^2v_1^2+u_2^2v_2^2+2u_1v_1u_2v_2 \leq u_1^2v_1^2 + u_2^2v_1^2+u_1^2v_2^2 + u_2^2v_2^2

2u_1v_1u_2v_2 \leq u_2^2v_1^2+u_1^2v_2^2

This is where I get stumped which means I messed up somewhere earlier in my proof. Any help here would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks a lot.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, Try number 2. Does this look right?

given: \mid u \cdot v \mid \leq \parallel u \parallel \parallel v \parallel

\frac{\mid u \cdot v \mid}{\parallel u \parallel \parallel v \parallel} \leq 1

since \cos \theta = \frac{\mid u \cdot v \mid}{\parallel u \parallel \parallel v \parallel} \leq 1

\Rightarrow \cos \theta \leq 1

thus the proof is true because by definition, \cos \theta \leq 1 for all values 0 \leq \theta \leq 2\pi
 
This is a perfect square and would be >=0

-2u_1v_1u_2v_2 + u_2^2v_1^2+u_1^2v_2^2 \geq 0

Now u can proceed
 
Last edited:
Yes both the prove are right
 
I didn't notice the perfect square... Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top