Help With Circular Motion Doubts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses doubts about circular motion, specifically the role of friction in maintaining a vehicle's circular path. It clarifies that friction, particularly static friction, acts towards the center of the circle because it prevents slipping between the tires and the road, even when the vehicle is in motion. The conversation also explains that in a banked turn, friction can be zero while still allowing for centripetal force, as the geometry of the turn can provide the necessary force without friction. Additionally, it emphasizes that friction does not oppose motion but rather opposes the tendency of motion at the contact point. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of vehicles in circular motion.
Cromptu
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello! I have a few doubts in circular motion and I'd really appreciate your help :)

1) There is a statement in my book ( I have attached images - the first one) according to which the only horizontal force towards the center on the vehicle is friction. I know that some centripetal force is necessary for the vehicle to move in a circle..but why friction? Friction opposes motion, yes, but if there is no friction, the body will move in the direction of its velocity which is tangential. So why isn't friction opposite to the direction of the velocity? Why is the direction of friction towards the center? Also, it is mentioned that static friction acts on the vehicle. But why static friction..if the body is moving? :/

2) The second image that I have attached describes the motion of a vehicle when the road is banked at an angle θ. But it says that the frictional force keeps the value of horizontal component of Normal force zero.What do they mean by this? Does friction balance this horizontal component? IF it does, why will there be an acceleration towards the center? And they haven't even shown the force of friction in the FBD..I am really very confused :/

- I have marked the lines with an *
 

Attachments

  • photo 1.jpg
    photo 1.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 460
  • photo 2.jpg
    photo 2.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 489
Physics news on Phys.org
The friction force towards the centre of the circle arises because the front wheels are turned inwards. This is not obvious in the diagram. I am assuming the track is horizontal.
If the track is 'banked' it is possible for the centripetal force to come about without friction.
 
Cromptu said:
Also, it is mentioned that static friction acts on the vehicle. But why static friction..if the body is moving?
As long as the tires aren't skidding along the pavement, the friction involved will be static friction. Realize that there is no relative motion (no slipping) between the patch of tire in contact with the road and the road. Kinetic friction requires such relative motion.

2) The second image that I have attached describes the motion of a vehicle when the road is banked at an angle θ. But it says that the frictional force keeps the value of horizontal component of Normal force zero.What do they mean by this?
I believe that it's just an awkwardly constructed sentence. They mean that the friction force is kept to zero, not the horizontal component of the normal force.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In the case of cars friction is responsible for linear motion, it is the force that pushes the car forward against air drag. In the first image we do not have a tangential force but that does not mean that there is no tangential friction force it means just that it cancels out with the air drag.In a real car things are bit more complicated because of the direction of the front wheels but in the end it is still correct to think that we have a single centripetal friction force acting on the center of mass of the car.

In the second figure they show that if the geometry is correct for some speeds and some cars there will be no tangential friction force.
 
you can understand the meaning correctly and app. after you study rotation torque and rolling.
 
Just to clarify something. Friction does NOT oppose the motion. Friction opposes the tendency of the motion of the point of contact between the object and the surface.

For example an upward rolling ball on an inclined plane is submitted to upward frictional force. In this case, the direction of friction is the same as that the whole motion of the ball, but it opposes the tendency of the motion of the point of contact.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top