Help with conversion of equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverickmathematics
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around converting the equation Q = C(v)^n to Q = C(ρv)^y, where v is velocity, ρ is a constant equal to 1.42, and C is a constant. The original poster is confused about how to solve for y and whether logarithms can be applied due to the subscripts used in the equations. Participants clarify that the subscripts do not affect the mathematical operations and that logarithms can indeed be used for the conversion. Ultimately, the consensus is that logarithmic methods are appropriate for solving the equation, regardless of the subscripts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding variable notation in mathematical equations.
maverickmathematics
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I'm trying to convert this equation into terms of y

Q = C (of v) ^n
Q = C (of rho.v) ^ y

v is the veloctiy and rho v is the flow of a material although that doesn't really matter. C is a contant, and rho is equal to 1.42.

When i write of v - i mean if writing it out on paper i would write C with a little v beneath it - the same with rho v.

Dots mean multiplication.

Please help me soon I'm sure I'm being dense but need help! Also my value for rho might be wrong!

Regards,

M
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please Help!
 
Q = C_v ^n
Q = C_v ^ y

Solved for y?
Just use logarithms.
 
Whozum -
in the first equation, it is C of v as you wrote
but in the second equation, it is C of rho times v

So logarithms cannot be used can't they?

Regards,

M
 
That doesn't make sense. The subscript is used to identify or elaborate on the variable, it doesn't hold any mathematical informaiton.
 
Q=C_{\rho*v}^y
i agree with whozum. you should just use logarithms. it doesn't matter about the subscript.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Just chatting with my son about Maths and he casually mentioned that 0 would be the midpoint of the number line from -inf to +inf. I wondered whether it wouldn’t be more accurate to say there is no single midpoint. Couldn’t you make an argument that any real number is exactly halfway between -inf and +inf?
Back
Top