Help with E/M Potential using Laplace Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fjolvar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace Potential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Laplace solution to find potential in a two-dimensional Cartesian problem. Participants clarify that X(x) can be expressed in various forms, including exponential, hyperbolic, and sinusoidal functions, depending on the boundary conditions. It is emphasized that the choice between sin/cos and sinh/cosh is determined by these conditions, as they influence the coefficients in the solution. The relationship between the different function forms is highlighted, noting that they ultimately yield equivalent solutions for Laplace's equation. Understanding the boundary conditions is crucial for selecting the appropriate function form and ensuring accurate results.
Fjolvar
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling to learn how to find the potential using laplace solution. I know that X(x) can be rewritten in terms of C1e^kx + D1e-kx OR C1 cosh kx + D1 sinh kx OR cos kx + sin kx... but when do you know how to use which form. I understand it partially but not fully. And then how do you consider Y(y)? Given its a 2-dim problem in cartesian. Any information or references would be immensely appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
C1e^kx + D1e-kx can be rewritten as C1 cosh kx + D1 sinh kx, correct? Depending on the geometry of the problem, but cos kx + sin kx cannot be rewritten right? You need one sinusoidal and one hyperbolic function in the 2dim case, is that right?
 
Cosine and sine can be related to cosh and sinh by scaling the argument by the imaginary number i. So there really is no difference between either one of the three formulations because in the end, all it will change is the phase of your solved modes k. But as long as you properly solve for the coefficients and k then you should come up with equivalent solutions for either of the three cases because all three form equivalent bases for the solutions to Laplace's equation in terms of the modes k. Although, some cases can be easier than others if you know more about the conditions of the problem. For example, if you know that the boundary conditions at infinity are Dirichlet with values of zero then using the exponential form is desirable because we can quickly see that the coefficient on the exp(kx) term must be zero otherwise the solution would blow up. This is not so readily seen if we took the sinusoidal or even hyperbolic sinusoidal cases.
 
If it's truly a 2-dimensional problem you just suppress the 3rd component (you can equally well do the formalism of separation of variables in only 2D, it turns out to be the same just with only two functions).

As far as choosing sin/cos or sinh/cosh, this kind of thing is revealed only by the boundary conditions. Let's say you know that X(x) is sins and cosines. Then the other component (assuming 2D) must be sinh/cosh (or the specific case of exponentials). This follows directly from the laplace equation, where you know that not all of the coefficients can be real/imaginary, but there must be some mixing.

Laplace equation is just all about the boundary conditions.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top