Help with Escape Velocity Problem

AI Thread Summary
Escape velocity is determined by the formula v^2 = 2GM/r, and the discussion centers on calculating the escape speed needed to leave both the Moon and Earth’s gravity. Participants debate whether to consider the escape velocities of both bodies separately or to treat them as a combined system. It is suggested that the Moon's escape velocity is negligible compared to Earth's, leading to the conclusion that one can approximate the escape velocity by adding the two values. The consensus leans towards treating the Earth-Moon system as a single object for a first approximation, thus combining their escape velocities. The final understanding is that for an object on the Moon, the escape speed must account for the gravitational influence of both celestial bodies.
CaptainEvil
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I know that escape velocity is given by v^2 = 2GM/r

My question is what is the approximate escape speed needed to completely escape the moon & Earth's gravity.

Is it the sum of their individual Escape velocities? or is it one equation, with the radius' added and masses added?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I would add the escape velocities, the value for the moon is pretty small anyway
 
Yea I was thinking that something (i.e moons EV) would be negligable since the question asked for the approximate value. But are you sure of that? Wouldn't it make sense astronomically - for something to escape moon's and Earth's gravity - that's on the moon, to have to travel slightly slower than Earth's EV since now we are much farther away?
 
I read it to mean at a great distance from both what's the escape velocity, ie. of the earth-moon system, in which case the Earth and moon's masses add so you can approx add their escape Vs
 
The exact wording of my problem is as follows:

"assuming one wished to escape completely from both the moon and Earth's gravity, what would the approximate escape speed be from the moon?"
 
Thats why I would regard it as a single object - and so for a first approximation add the escape Vs
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top