Help with First Order Differential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a first-order differential equation related to rate of accumulation, generation, and output. The original poster expresses uncertainty in solving the equation after rearranging it, particularly with an extra constant appearing in their attempts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss simplifying the equation by removing a term to gain insight into the solution structure. There are questions about the appropriateness of this approach and the implications of introducing constants in the equation. The use of integrating factors is also debated, with participants examining the necessary form for applying this method.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different strategies to approach the differential equation. Some participants suggest simplifying the problem as a preliminary step, while others express concern about deviating from the original equation. The conversation reflects a mix of guidance and inquiry, with no clear consensus yet on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of the problem, including the presence of constants and the specific form required for applying integrating factors. The original poster's homework context may impose certain rules or expectations that influence the discussion.

Tom Hardy
Messages
45
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


AWzLt5n.jpg

The Attempt at a Solution



The first part is fairly simple I think. It's just rate of accumulation = rate of generation - rate of output(losses)

I'm not too sure how to solve this differential equation. I divide the whole equation through by mc and rearrange but I keep getting an extra constant and I have no idea what to do with it.

I get someone in the form dtheta/dt + P(t)theta = Q(t) + constant and I have no idea how to solve that. Any help will be appreciated, thank you.
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term that is messing things up is ## mc_vkt ##. So, first solve the differential equation without that term. You'll get a solution of the form Constant*Something. This gives you an idea of how the solution might look like : try the form C(t)*Something (same Something, now C(t) is what you solve for.)
 
wabbit said:
The term that is messing things up is ## mc_vkt ##. So, first solve the differential equation without that term. You'll get a solution of the form Constant*Something. This gives you an idea of how the solution might look like : try the form C(t)*Something (same Something, now C(t) is what you solve for.)

Hey, thanks for replying. Surely if I just remove a term from the differential I won't be solving what I'm supposed to or am I missing something else? :S
 
Of course you won't, but it's like a warm up lap. The solution to the simplified equation serves you as a basis from which you build the solution to the full equation - this is a very common and useful strategy in diff equations (and not only there)

I told you how in first post
 
Divide your equation through by ##mc_v## and put it in the form$$
\frac{d\theta}{dt}+\alpha \theta = \alpha \theta_w + kt$$That is a constant coefficient linear DE. You can solve it using constant coefficient methods for homogeneous and non-homogeneous equations, or use an integrating factor ##e^{\alpha t}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom Hardy
LCKurtz said:
Divide your equation through by ##mc_v## and put it in the form$$
\frac{d\theta}{dt}+\alpha \theta = \alpha \theta_w + kt$$That is a constant coefficient linear DE. You can solve it using constant coefficient methods for homogeneous and non-homogeneous equations, or use an integrating factor ##e^{\alpha t}##.

Hey thanks for answering, I thought about that but surely that's not in the correct form to use an integrating factor? From my notes on the left it should just be Q(t) but we have a constant term in there as well.
 
Tom Hardy said:
Hey thanks for answering, I thought about that but surely that's not in the correct form to use an integrating factor? From my notes on the left it should just be Q(t) but we have a constant term in there as well.
What do you mean by "it" in ... on the left it should just be Q(t) ?

That is the correct integrating factor.

What is the derivative of ## \theta\,e^{\alpha\, t}\ ##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom Hardy
SammyS said:
What do you mean by "it" in ... on the left it should just be Q(t) ?

That is the correct integrating factor.

What is the derivative of ## \theta\,e^{\alpha\, t}\ ##?

No I get that, it's just that I thought in order to use the integrating factor differentials had to be in the form dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x)

and LCKurtz reply mentioned dividing through by mc to get dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x) + constant
I'm just wondering is it still okay to use the IF here?
 
Tom Hardy said:
No I get that, it's just that I thought in order to use the integrating factor differentials had to be in the form dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x)

and LCKurtz reply mentioned dividing through by mc to get dy/dx + p(x)y = Q(x) + constant
I'm just wondering is it still okay to use the IF here?

Why don't you just try it and see what happens?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom Hardy
  • #10
LCKurtz said:
Why don't you just try it and see what happens?

Fine, I'll give it a go now.
 
  • #11
LCKurtz said:
Why don't you just try it and see what happens?
Ah, it worked out, thank you for your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K