Help With Momentum Conservation & Football Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two physics problems related to momentum conservation. In the first scenario, two skaters push off each other on a frictionless surface, with one skater moving at 6 m/s; the user initially miscalculated the resulting velocity of the first skater as 9 seconds instead of the correct unit of 9 m/s. The second scenario involves a collision between a fullback and a linebacker, where the user initially calculated forces but was corrected to consider momentum instead, concluding that the fullback would push the linebacker into the end zone due to greater momentum. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding momentum over force in collision scenarios. Overall, the user seeks clarification on their calculations and the correct interpretation of momentum conservation principles.
DLT
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys would need some help here, not sure if I did it right cause recently I got so lost/confused in the class, just out of no where. I always understood most of the stuff and the thing that irritates me is that it doesn`t seem hard at all. So here goes.

Conservation Of Momentum

1) Two figure skaters are facing each other, with their palms together.Both skaters are intially at rest on a frictionless surface. The 1st skater has a mass of 40kg and the 2nd skater has a mass of 60kg. 1st skater pushes off of skater ( 2nd one ) in such a way that skater #1 moves left and skater #2 moves right. After the puss off skater #2 moves with velocity of 6m/s. Determine the direction and volecity of skater #1 after the push.

Now this is as far as I know a recoil problem. Where do I start at ? I came up with an answer of 9 seconds but the way I did it looks way too easy. Could some one help me out with this one ?

Here`s another one.

2) A 100kg fullback is running due west with a velocity of 10m/s. At the goal line he collides head-on with a 120kg linebacker, moving due east at 8m/s. Based on the info given, does the fullback drive the linebacker into the end zone or is he pushed backwards by the linebacker ? Explain the reasoning.

I found the forces of both runners.

  • Fullback - 1000N
  • Linebacker -960N

So the fullback should make it into the end zone, cause he is running with bigger force than the linebacker.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DLT said:
1) Two figure skaters are facing each other, with their palms together.Both skaters are intially at rest on a frictionless surface. The 1st skater has a mass of 40kg and the 2nd skater has a mass of 60kg. 1st skater pushes off of skater ( 2nd one ) in such a way that skater #1 moves left and skater #2 moves right. After the puss off skater #2 moves with velocity of 6m/s. Determine the direction and volecity of skater #1 after the push.

Now this is as far as I know a recoil problem. Where do I start at ? I came up with an answer of 9 seconds but the way I did it looks way too easy. Could some one help me out with this one ?
Well nine seconds isn't correct.
DLT said:
2) A 100kg fullback is running due west with a velocity of 10m/s. At the goal line he collides head-on with a 120kg linebacker, moving due east at 8m/s. Based on the info given, does the fullback drive the linebacker into the end zone or is he pushed backwards by the linebacker ? Explain the reasoning.

I found the forces of both runners.

  • Fullback - 1000N
  • Linebacker -960N

So the fullback should make it into the end zone, cause he is running with bigger force than the linebacker.
No, you didn't calculate the forces, you calculated their momenta. Since the fullback had a greater momentum than the linebacker, when the two collide their resultant momentum (assuming they stick together) will be in the same direction as the fullback is traveling (by conservation of momentum). Therefore, your conclusion is correct, but your reasoning is wrong.
 
Thanks for the answer. Now would this drawing work to support my reasoning. I changed the units as you said that I was wrong.

Before collision
960kg m/s ------> <------ 1000kg m/s​

After collision
<------ 40kg m/s​

Hootenanny said:
Well nine seconds isn't correct.

By making "seconds" red do you mean that the "number" I got is right but my units are wrong ? It should be 9m/s.
 
Last edited:
DLT said:
Thanks for the answer. Now would this drawing work to support my reasoning. I changed the units as you said that I was wrong.

Before collision
960kg m/s ------> <------ 1000kg m/s​

After collision
<------ 40kg m/s​
Much better :approve:
DLT said:
By making "seconds" red do you mean that the "number" I got is right but my units are wrong ? It should be 9m/s.
Looks better, but don't forget to take account of the direction...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top