Help with multiple magnetic field device

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating a device with multiple metal detectors to visualize the shape of metal objects within walls. The concept involves using 10-16 detectors arranged in a grid, each linked to an LED that lights up upon detecting metal. Concerns are raised about the device's ability to differentiate between the metal in the wall and the detectors themselves, suggesting that careful calibration and possibly sequential powering of the detectors could mitigate interference. Participants express skepticism about the practicality of the design, noting that a single detector could achieve similar results by being swept across the wall. Overall, the project presents significant challenges, particularly regarding the use of magnetic fields and circuit design without programming.
Thorgeir-DK
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Greetings everyone
I am deciding on a project to work on for my bachelor's degree in engineering right now. I have an idea that involves using multiple metal detectors placed about 1-2 cm apart from each other.
The idea is to develop a device that is able to detect the shape of an metal item inside a wall (such as for example a wire).

So the question to you would be. Is it theoretically possible to construct a device like this using relatively simple circuits?
Also, I am not sure if it is theoretically possible due to the interaction between the magnetic fields. Does anyone here have any insights into how magnetic fields would interact in a device like this?

More details on the idea:
The device should have ~10-16 LED's which will be connected to ~10-16 metal detectors arranged in a grid. When a metal is detected, the corresponding LED lights up. Thus giving the user the possibility to see the shape of the object hidden in the wall.

Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thorgeir Gisli
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Metal detectors contain metal, so the device will certainly "see" itself. You will need some way to distinguish metal in a wall from the metal and the magnetic fields in the detector (=closer to the detectors, and probably more metal). I guess a careful calibration can do this, but it won't be an easy task. Powering them in a sequence (so only one detector is active at a time) could help.

With 10-16 LEDs, do you expect a significant advantage compared to a single detector, swept over the wall?
 
Yeea, its starting to sound quite impractical.
I am studying product and design psychology and this semester is all about circuits. We are supposed to create a device using circuits, we cannot use any programming such as an Arduino or anything like that.
I thought it might be an interesting concept to have a device which could show you the shape of a metal object inside the wall. But the more I think about it, the more problematic it starts to sound. We have no experience using magnetic fields anyway.
Also as you said, a single detector swept over the wall does pretty much the same thing.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top