MHB Help with Projective Algebraic Geometry - Cox et al Section 8.1, Exs 5(a) & 5(b)

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
Projective Algebraic Geometry - the Projective Plane ... Cox et al - Section 8.1, Exs 5(a) & 5(b)

I am reading the undergraduate introduction to algebraic geometry entitled "Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms: An introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra (Third Edition) by David Cox, John Little and Donal O'Shea ... ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 8, Section 1: The Projective Plane ... ... and need help getting started with Exercises 5(a) and 5(b) ... ...Exercise 5 in Section 8.1 reads as follows:View attachment 5745
Can someone please help me to get started on Exercises 5(a) and 5(b) shown above ...Peter
======================================================================To give readers of the above post some idea of the context of the exercise and also the notation I am providing some relevant text from Cox et al ... ... as follows:
View attachment 5746
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5747
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5748
View attachment 5749
View attachment 5750
View attachment 5751
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Projective Algebraic Geometry - the Projective Plane ... Cox et al - Section 8.1, Exs 5(a) & 5(b

Peter said:
I am reading the undergraduate introduction to algebraic geometry entitled "Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms: An introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra (Third Edition) by David Cox, John Little and Donal O'Shea ... ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 8, Section 1: The Projective Plane ... ... and need help getting started with Exercises 5(a) and 5(b) ... ...Exercise 5 in Section 8.1 reads as follows:
Can someone please help me to get started on Exercises 5(a) and 5(b) shown above ...Peter
======================================================================To give readers of the above post some idea of the context of the exercise and also the notation I am providing some relevant text from Cox et al ... ... as follows:
Just reporting to MHB members that I have had the following help from Andrew Kirk on the Physics Forums:"... ... ... We want the equation to be compatible with the equation $$y=x^2$$ and we also want it to give a well-defined curve, which means it must be homogeneous in $$x,y$$ and $$z$$.A simple equation that satisfies both those is $$yz=x^2$$. Then for $$z=1$$ this gives the original equation. Any point in $$\mathbb R^2$$ with nonzero $$z$$ is the same as a point with $$z=1$$. The only other points are those with $$z=0$$, which are at infinity. For such points we will also have, courtesy of the equation, $$x=0$$. So the set of points on the curve at infinity are those on the $$y$$ axis in $$\mathbb R^2$$. This comprises two equivalence classes: [(0,0,0)] and [(0,1,0)]. So there are two points at infinity, which sounds like what we would want for a parabola (which answers part (b)). ... ... "I have also found a description of the process for extending algebraic curves from the Euclidean plane to the Projective plane in Robert Bix' book: "Conics and Cubics: A Concrete Introduction to Algebraic Curves" ... ... as follows:View attachment 5769
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5770
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5771
Peter
 
Last edited:
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top