Help with simple matrix algebra

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the matrix equation s = r*H, where s is a 1x3 vector and H is a 3x6 matrix. The primary issue is that H is not square, making it impossible to directly invert. The use of the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse is suggested as a potential solution, although it is noted that A^TA is singular, complicating the process. The conversation highlights the importance of ensuring consistent dimensions for the matrices involved. Ultimately, the problem emphasizes the challenges of working with non-square matrices in algebraic equations.
rusty009
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm having trouble solving this matrix problem, basically I have,

s=r*H

where s = [ 1 1 0] and,

H=
1 0 1 1 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 0
1 1 0 0 0 1

I am trying to find out what the matrix r is but it won't work in matlab. I have tried inverting H but it isn't a square matrix. So I tried pseudoinverse psinv and it still doesn't seem to be working. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your problem is that this is impossible. H has three rows and 6 columns so r must have three columns. If it also has n rows, s would have to have n rows and 6 columns. Since s has one row, n can be 1 but s has 3 columns, not 6.
 
Your equation is of the form :
<br /> \vec{a} = \vec{b}A<br />

Where b is the 1x3 vector we are looking for and a is a 1x6 vector . As you mentioned, your matrix isn't square an thus not normally invertible. By the Moore-Penrose Pseudoinverse, there does exist a solution (infinitely many actually).
Your matrix A is an mxn matrix where m<n and is also full-rank, so:
<br /> A^\dagger = (A^TA)^{-1}A^T<br />
Where A-dagger is the Moore-Penrose Pseudoinverse. Notice that only because A was full rank could you use this formula, otherwise you have to use the singular value decomposition .
I've tried A^\dagger = (A^TA)^{-1}A^T with your matrix but A^TA turns out to be singular. I suppose you could try to take the pseudoinverse of that too, but then I'm not sure if everything will work out as you had wanted.

Edit: I made a silly mistake with the size of r :redface: (as HallsofIvy pointed out). The above would have been useful for consistent sizes and a full rank matrix.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top