Help with Solving This Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmie 88
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation in question is (100)(0.2x)(0.8)(100 - x) = 2, which involves a binomial distribution problem. The original poster is uncertain whether to divide 100 by 2 or include 2 in the multiplication. Clarification on the grouping of terms is needed for effective assistance. A reminder is given to avoid double posting in different sections of the forum. Understanding the correct format is crucial for solving the equation accurately.
jimmie 88
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, could use a hand with this,
(100) (.2)X(.8) 100-X =
2

This equation is written in this format and I can't remember wether I should divide 100 by 2 or use the 2 as part of the multiplication. Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is this what you are trying to write out?

<br /> (100)(0.2x)(.8)(100 - x) = 2<br />
 
jimmie 88 said:
Hello, could use a hand with this,
(100) (.2)X(.8) 100-X =
2
This equation is written in this format and I can't remember wether I should divide 100 by 2 or use the 2 as part of the multiplication. Thanks
I am confused by your grouping here.

if you can clear it up a bit I think I can help you out.
 
Please to do not double post! You posted this in the homework section and I responded there.

(This is a binomial distribution problem.)
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top