Help with the matrix representation of <-|+|->. Does "+"=|+>?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the matrix representation of quantum states and operators, specifically focusing on the spin operators \( S_x \) and \( S_y \) in quantum mechanics. Participants are exploring the implications of notation and the simplification of expressions involving kets and bras.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to prove various versions of equations involving quantum states and operators. There is a focus on understanding the simplification of expressions and the meaning of symbols in different contexts, particularly the interpretation of "+" and "-" outside of kets and bras.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the notation used in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to operator addition and the representation of spin operators. There appears to be an ongoing exploration of how to express these operators clearly, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the notation used in quantum mechanics, which may lead to confusion regarding the representation of states and operators. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the notation and its implications for understanding the underlying mathematics.

yoyopizza
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I'm working on problem 1.10 in Sakurai (1.8 in version 1 or 2), where I'm supposed to prove the commutation relation on [S_i,S_j]=i\epsilon_{ijk}h_bar*S_k
Relevant Equations
S_x=hbar/2(|+><-|+|-><+|)
S_y=ihbar/2(-|+><-|+|-><+|)
S_z=hbar/2(|+><+|-|-><-|)
Trying to use <+|+>=1=<-|-> and <-|+>=0 to prove each iteration of the equation, so I have 6 different versions to prove. But the part I'm currently stuck on is understanding how to simplify any given version. I've written out [S_x,S_y]=S_xS_y\psi-S_yS_x\psi and expanded it in terms of the |+>,|-> kets and bras. Then using associativity I've broken up some of the three term components like <-|+|-> into (<-|)(+|->) which I'm assuming will allow me to remove some terms, however now I don't really understand what + or - means in the absence of being inside a ket or bra. I can't imagine they equal their usual matrix representation because then +=|+> which makes no sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of Sakurai's notation is a bit wild and woolly in my opinion. What we have here, for example, is:
$$S_x = \frac \hbar 2[(|+\rangle \langle -|) + (|-\rangle \langle +|)]$$ I.e. it is the sum of two operators, each formed by the outer product of a ket with a bra.

Does that help?

PS The ##+## in the middle is the plain old symbol for (in this case) operator addition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, yoyopizza and TSny
Ahhh, that does help. So to expand on that, ## S_y=\frac{i\hbar}{2}(-|+><-|)+(|-><+|)## i assume. And this would imply that the first negative sign there just means negative ##|+>## Thanks
 
Last edited:
yoyopizza said:
Ahhh, that does help. So to expand on that, ## S_y=\frac{i\hbar}{2}(-|+><-|)+(|-><+|)## i assume. And this would imply that the first negative sign there just means negative ##|+>## Thanks
Yes, I don't know why he didn't write: $$S_y=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}[(|+><-|)-(|-><+|)]$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yoyopizza
PeroK said:
Yes, I don't know why he didn't write: $$S_y=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$

Yeah that would have been much more clear. Thanks a ton.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
915
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K