Help with the matrix representation of <-|+|->. Does "+"=|+>?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
yoyopizza
Messages
39
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I'm working on problem 1.10 in Sakurai (1.8 in version 1 or 2), where I'm supposed to prove the commutation relation on [S_i,S_j]=i\epsilon_{ijk}h_bar*S_k
Relevant Equations
S_x=hbar/2(|+><-|+|-><+|)
S_y=ihbar/2(-|+><-|+|-><+|)
S_z=hbar/2(|+><+|-|-><-|)
Trying to use <+|+>=1=<-|-> and <-|+>=0 to prove each iteration of the equation, so I have 6 different versions to prove. But the part I'm currently stuck on is understanding how to simplify any given version. I've written out [S_x,S_y]=S_xS_y\psi-S_yS_x\psi and expanded it in terms of the |+>,|-> kets and bras. Then using associativity I've broken up some of the three term components like <-|+|-> into (<-|)(+|->) which I'm assuming will allow me to remove some terms, however now I don't really understand what + or - means in the absence of being inside a ket or bra. I can't imagine they equal their usual matrix representation because then +=|+> which makes no sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of Sakurai's notation is a bit wild and woolly in my opinion. What we have here, for example, is:
$$S_x = \frac \hbar 2[(|+\rangle \langle -|) + (|-\rangle \langle +|)]$$ I.e. it is the sum of two operators, each formed by the outer product of a ket with a bra.

Does that help?

PS The ##+## in the middle is the plain old symbol for (in this case) operator addition.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, yoyopizza and TSny
Ahhh, that does help. So to expand on that, ## S_y=\frac{i\hbar}{2}(-|+><-|)+(|-><+|)## i assume. And this would imply that the first negative sign there just means negative ##|+>## Thanks
 
Last edited:
yoyopizza said:
Ahhh, that does help. So to expand on that, ## S_y=\frac{i\hbar}{2}(-|+><-|)+(|-><+|)## i assume. And this would imply that the first negative sign there just means negative ##|+>## Thanks
Yes, I don't know why he didn't write: $$S_y=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}[(|+><-|)-(|-><+|)]$$
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yoyopizza
PeroK said:
Yes, I don't know why he didn't write: $$S_y=-\frac{i\hbar}{2}[(|+><-|)+(|-><+|)]$$

Yeah that would have been much more clear. Thanks a ton.