Help with This: Can Someone Assist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vytautasr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the geometry of a circle, specifically focusing on the relationships between a chord length, angles, and radii. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and interpretations of a diagram related to the problem, which includes right angles and trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the length of the chord L using the formula \(L = 2R \sin(\beta)\) and derives expressions for \(\sin(\beta)\) and \(\cos(\beta)\), but expresses uncertainty about discrepancies in the results.
  • Another participant questions the necessity of right angle indicators in the diagram, suggesting they are simply to indicate that the lines are radii of the circle.
  • Some participants clarify that the right angles reinforce the perpendicularity of the radii to the circle, although they note that tangents are not depicted in the diagram.
  • A participant proposes a method involving bisecting angle \(\beta\) and using the double angle formula to derive relationships between the variables, asserting that the calculations work out under certain substitutions.
  • There is a discussion about the assumptions made regarding the angles and the relationships between the vertical and horizontal lines in the diagram, with some participants noting that these assumptions are not explicitly shown.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about why their initial calculations did not yield the correct answer, suggesting a potential oversight in their simplification process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and interpretation of the right angle indicators in the diagram. There is no consensus on the correctness of the initial calculations or the assumptions made regarding the angles and relationships in the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge potential mistakes in the problem text and the need for careful simplification of equations. The discussion reflects various interpretations of geometric relationships without resolving the discrepancies in calculations.

vytautasr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Could someone please help me with this??
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    6.6 KB · Views: 502
Physics news on Phys.org
the lengt of the cord L is given by 2Rsin(b), so we compute sin(b)=(8Lh)/(L^2+4h^2). So cos(b)=sqrt(1-sin^2(b)), but the result i obtain in this way is that the sqrt of the denominator is correct, but the numerator is different because i obtain sqrt(L^4+4h^4-56L^2h^2) that is different by (L^2-4h^2)^2...i think there is a mistake in the text of the problem, but I'm not sure of my results...
 
I think this diagram is missing something.

What exactly are the two right angle symbols doing at the ends of the two lower radii?
 
Simple:

Angle \beta[/tex] is part of a right triangle.<br /> The adjacent side is equal to R-h<br /> The hypotenuse is equal to R<br /> <br /> Therefore, \cos \theta = \frac{R-h}{R}[/tex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Substitute the value for R that you were given...
 
Studiot said:
What exactly are the two right angle symbols doing at the ends of the two lower radii?

It looks a bit unorthodox, but every radius of a circle is perpendicular to the circle at the point where it intersects. More clearly, it is perpendicular to the tangent of the circle at that point.

As far as I can tell, they are there simply to reinforce the fact that the two lower lines are, in fact, radii of the circle (arc)
 
Thank you, I am aware of circle geometry, but it does not answer my question since no tangents appear in the diagram.
 
Studiot said:
Thank you, I am aware of circle geometry, but it does not answer my question since no tangents appear in the diagram.

The right angle indicators are not needed for this problem.
As I already stated, I believe they are there just to reinforce the fact that those are indeed radii of the arc.

Besides, tangents are not necessary; a line (or line segment) is perpendicular to a curve if it is perpendicular to the tangent at the point of intersection.
 
zgozvrm said:
The right angle indicators are not needed for this problem.
As I already stated, I believe they are there just to reinforce the fact that those are indeed radii of the arc.

Besides, tangents are not necessary; a line (or line segment) is perpendicular to a curve if it is perpendicular to the tangent at the point of intersection.

I know the original post is 4 weeks old, but here's my two cents worth.

The distance, d, from the point where the vertical line intersects the circle, to the point on the left (or on the right, if you prefer) where the circle intersects the horizontal line is:

\textstyle d=\sqrt{({{L}\over{2}})^2+h^2}.

Bisect the angle \textstyle \beta.

<br /> \displaystyle \sin\left({{\beta}\over{2}}\right)={{d/2}\over{R}}={{\sqrt{({{L}\over{2}})^2+h^2}}\over{2R}}={{\sqrt{L^2+4h^2}}\over{4R}}<br />

Using the double angle formula:
\textstyle \cos\beta=1-2\sin^2\left({{\beta}\over{2}}\right)

<br /> \displaystyle = 1-2\left[\,{{\sqrt{L^2+4h^2}}\over{4R}}\ \right]^2<br />

Substitute {{L^2+4h^2}\over{8h}} for R and simplify. It does work out.


 
SammyS said:

I know the original post is 4 weeks old, but here's my two cents worth.

The distance, d, from the point where the vertical line intersects the circle, to the point on the left (or on the right, if you prefer) where the circle intersects the horizontal line is:

\textstyle d=\sqrt{({{L}\over{2}})^2+h^2}.

Bisect the angle \textstyle \beta.

<br /> \displaystyle \sin\left({{\beta}\over{2}}\right)={{d/2}\over{R}}={{\sqrt{({{L}\over{2}})^2+h^2}}\over{2R}}={{\sqrt{L^2+4h^2}}\over{4R}}<br />

Using the double angle formula:
\textstyle \cos\beta=1-2\sin^2\left({{\beta}\over{2}}\right)

<br /> \displaystyle = 1-2\left[\,{{\sqrt{L^2+4h^2}}\over{4R}}\ \right]^2<br />

Substitute {{L^2+4h^2}\over{8h}} for R and simplify. It does work out.




Correct. But the way I read it, you are given the fact that

R = \frac{L^2 +4h^2}{8h}

so, we know that the vertical line from the bottom of the diagram (the center of the circle) to the horizontal line segment is equal to (R - h) and, since the horizontal line segment is of length L (between the points where it intersects the circle). That gives us:

\cos(\beta) = \frac{R - h}{R}

Substitute for R and simplify:

\frac{R - h}{R} = \frac{\frac{L^2 + 4h^2}{8h} - h}{\frac{L^2 + 4h^2}{8h}} = \frac{\frac{L^2 + 4h^2}{8h} - \frac{8h^2}{8h}}{\frac{L^2 + 4h^2}{8h}} = \frac{\frac{L^2 + 4h^2 - 8h^2}{8h}}{\frac{L^2 + 4h^2}{8h}} = \frac{L^2 + 4h^2 - 8h^2}{L^2 + 4h^2} = \frac{L^2 - 4h^2}{L^2 + 4h^2}


Note that we are both assuming that \angle \beta[/tex], between the vertical line and the radius on the left, is the same as the angle between the vertical line and the radius on the right (or that the vertical line is perpendicular to the horizontal line). Neither of these are shown on the diagram.
 
  • #10
But why my in my first post i didn't found the correct answer?
 
  • #11
Andrea2 said:
the lengt of the cord L is given by 2Rsin(b), so we compute sin(b)=(8Lh)/(L^2+4h^2). So cos(b)=sqrt(1-sin^2(b)), but the result i obtain in this way is that the sqrt of the denominator is correct, but the numerator is different because i obtain sqrt(L^4+4h^4-56L^2h^2) that is different by (L^2-4h^2)^2...i think there is a mistake in the text of the problem, but I'm not sure of my results...

Andrea2 said:
But why my in my first post i didn't found the correct answer?

You started out with L = 2R \sin(\beta)[/tex] and were given<br /> <br /> R = \frac{L^2 + 4h^2}{8h}<br /> <br /> but, when you simplified your equation, you forgot the &quot;2&quot;; you <i>should</i> have come up with<br /> <br /> \sin(\beta) = \frac{L}{2R} = \frac{4Lh}{L^2 + 4h^2}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
905
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
895
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K