Help with waveform control: frequency, phase and amplitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the need for a programmable controller that can monitor and adjust the output of a transformer connected to a load, maintaining specific parameters such as waveform, phase angle, amplitude, and frequency. Participants suggest exploring digital signal processing solutions, recommending platforms like Analog Devices Sigma Studio and miniDSP for their integrated features. There is an emphasis on the importance of a high sampling rate to prevent oscillations and ensure stability in output adjustments. The conversation also touches on the potential use of a PC-based solution for signal analysis and control, while clarifying that the output phase shift is influenced by the load characteristics. Ultimately, the goal is to create a versatile system capable of generating and stabilizing signals across a range of frequencies and load conditions.
artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
976
Hello, I am looking for a controller whether programmable or otherwise that could function as a drive and control circuit which would monitor a transformer output connected to a load and then drive an amplifier with a signal that is proportional to the needed one in order to control the output accordingly.

The idea is as follows, I set in certain parameters in the controller, like for example
1)waveform= sine
2) phase angle between U and I = 0
3) amplitude =100v
4)frequency = 50hz

Then the controller inputs a signal that is proportional to this (except for voltage ofcourse) into the amplifier and the amplifier drives a transformer , the output of the transformer is connected to a load , the controller monitors this output and tries to keep the output to match the parameters that I have set for the controller, if some parameters start to deviate from the setpoint then the controller adjusts the amplifier input accordingly until given parameters are again restored.
I suppose that in order to attain good stability the controller sample rate would have to be high enough so that the changes don't start oscillations etc

I have attached a block diagram of my envisioned setup,
could you please give me any ideas in which direction to look for such circuits and IC's or maybe there is already a product on the market that does exactly this?
SHEMA for device.png


PS. maybe the amplifier could be a class D amp without the analog input and the controller could drive it directly with a high frequency modulated signal which would be demodulated by the transformer in the output to get a sine of lower frequency?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's not clear what you are trying to control. Is is just amplitude, or amplitude and frequency and waveform and phase? If you watch both U and I at the output, what is the load applied to the output of this device?

Would you describe this device as a signal generator?

You ask about components to buy, but in good design it is best to be 100% clear on what you are trying to accomplish before asking the question "how to do it?"
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
It seems you are building a high power calibrator, and want to eliminate the gain and phase error of the power amplifier while output load changes.
What range of frequency does it need to cover ?

To correct the phase you need a master phase reference input signal. Then use a Phase Locked Loop to adjust the input oscillator frequency, so output phase is corrected.
What are the U and I signals ?

To correct the amplitude you will need an output amplitude detector and integrator, or a true RMS circuit to provide an estimate of the output. Compare that estimate with the required output and change the amplitude of the source, or the gain of the amplifier to correct the error.
 

Hi, since your system is both generating and also monitoring signals I would suggest that you look in the direction of digital signal processing. There are many processors to choose from but I think that you should look for some 'canned' solutions that are pretty much all in one chip or board.
Check out Analog Devices Sigma Studio for such. Also, a company called miniDSP supplies premade modules that offer a wide variety of features like signal generation, filtering, integration etc. These are intended for audio applications so the bandwidth is up to 20kHz, I imagine that your requirements would be in the frequency range spanned by audio so this is a good place to start looking.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The idea is mostly to have a power source with which I can test different inductive/reactive loads across a frequency range but at the same time keep my output constant in amplitude, phase shift etc.

For example let's just say that I want precisely 100v in my output at 50hz and phase shift should be 0, now let's say I drive a resistive load with my output and then suddenly switch on an inductive load parallel to my resistive one , ideally I would want for my output to have as little of a "hiccup" as possible while at the same time the output should adjust so that the set initial conditions are met.

Surely I could do this by hand adjusting frequency generator and function generator outputs which would be the amplifier inputs but that takes time and is inconvenient it would be much better if I could have a DSP chip or something similar which would do all this for me.

@anorlunda well you could label it as a signal generator (if one accepts that a signal generator can also output powerful signals)

@Baluncore the frequency range I would probably need to divide into categories where one would have 1-20kHz and then another device for higher frequencies but the essential function is the same so we might as well for now just cover 1-20/25Khz.

Could it be that what @sprog said is the best way to look for? because as far as I know these days such functions should be available in microprocessors and Ic's aka ready plug n play boards or one that I could make myself although I guess due to the smd components and complexity in making boards for chips (I have mostly made larger ones for discrete components) it would be more convenient to buy a ready solution and adapt it to my needs.

I guess for simplicity I would love to start this with using a simple AB amplifier and maybe later move on to class D, so I guess I would need the controller then to put out the signal in analog forms , in class D I imagined that maybe there could be a controller that could put out the waveform already modulated and so I could bypass the amplifiers input analog to digital converter but I guess having an AB amp and analog signal would be easier for starters.

Anyway as I said I need not just voltage/amplitude adjustment I also need frequency and phase shift control capability, otherwise the phase shift would change with load at output and so would frequency a little and probably voltage amplitude also.
The only thing I don't need to worry about is current as that would be determined by the load given a constant voltage/frequency and phase shift is maintained.
 
In theory I could do without the transformer at the amplifier output but it serves mostly two purposes, firstly as a safety device for the amplifier/load and also mostly as an impedance matching and voltage step up device, because many loads require higher voltages and building an amplifier that works in high volt DC rails makes the amplifier more likely to fail as well as the choice for parts like output transistors becomes harder as most transistor SOA is limited to about 200/250volts. (for bipolar ones)

In class D case maybe I could use high voltage switches like IGBT's but then I'm not sure about how "clean" the output to my load would be and would it not have to have complicated filtering in order to not have harmonics at the output.Anyway the amplifier part is not a problem I have built many amp modules over the years an d just have to chose a better suited one, my main concern is with the signal control capability aka the controller as I don't have such a thing and for now am not sure where/how to get one
 
ps. could there be any software based solutions for this out there, maybe for starters I could make a resistor voltage divider to decrease the output signal to a safe level and then feed it into a pc sound card , then have the software analyze the signal. compare it to my set values and adjust the output signal as necessary then I simply feed the output of my pc sound card to my amplifier input ?

@sprog I'm looking at the sigma studio now , will have to read up a bit
 
I think Sigma Studio could work very well for your intent, the power stage would be all that is required. On real-time audio DSP systems there is frequently an I2S output port - this can be connected to a class-D audio amplifier module, there are a number of manufactureres of pre made amplifiers. The output transformer can be used to obtain the right output voltage range for your application
 
A p.c. based solution is also possible but you would need to write signal processing code in that environment. There are some PC based tools worth looking at in that regard, like audiomulch that might work, but it's been a long time since I used any of that stuff.
 
  • #10
Don't forget the phase difference between voltage and current is determined by the load, not the supply. If you switch out a resistor and switch in an inductor at constant voltage phase, then the current shifts by 90 degrees.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and zoki85
  • #11
As anorlunda explained, a calibrator must be set to regulate either current or voltage output.

You are building a “calibrator” similar to a Fluke model 5100, or 5200, but have not specified the precision you require.
Google 'Fluke calibrator' read the Operators Manual.
 
  • #12
@anorlunda yes correct in pointing that out, I should have specified aka made more clear that the intention of the feedback is not to stop phase shift as that cannot be entirely done since it is determined by the physical characteristics of load but instead watch the output of the amplifier and adjust accordingly , sort of similar to how a grid connected power plant would do , say the inductive load in the grid becomes too large so the grid operator switches on capacitor banks to adjust or vice versa switching on shunt reactors to adjust for a current leading voltage situation.Although unlike in a grid here I could shape the output with the help of my input waveform in the amplifier, like if the output is getting very inductive and current lags voltage then I could shape the input waveform accordingly to compensate , as far as I know this should be doable , right?
 
  • #13
artis said:
Although unlike in a grid here I could shape the output with the help of my input waveform in the amplifier, like if the output is getting very inductive and current lags voltage then I could shape the input waveform accordingly to compensate , as far as I know this should be doable , right?
Your descriptions still confuse me. That sounds like you are trying to make a power grid simulator. @Baluncore thinks you are trying to create a calibrator. But both interpretations presume sinusoidal waveforms, not arbitrary waveforms.

Perhaps we have a language problem. What do you mean by "shape the waveform?"
 
  • #14
Well it's not exactly a grid simulator , it's simply an amplifier with a controllable output.
just to give an example, say I want to build a small ferrite transformer for high frequency, I want to test it's capability and see the optimum frequency etc, I hook it up to this device and just sweep across a certain frequency range and load the transformer and watch it's performance on a scope.

Sure I could just get myself a frequency generator and connect it with my amplifier but the output voltage amplitude would change across a wider frequency range as well as I would love to have the capability to also generate sawtooth or square waves so i guess I need a function generator but then there is just one more problem , ok I have the frequency and waveform capability but how to I make the output stable in amplitude over a wide frequency range.

I'm certain all this is possible I'm just thinking how and which is the optimal option in terms of price/usability.
I think right now I'm looking at either a software solution or a programmable microcontroller , something like an arduino or something
 
  • #15
You haven't mentioned yet the power needed. Cost will be strongly a function of that. Also the range of V I and frequency needed.

Edit and the size of your budget.
 
  • #16
Take a look at a FeelTech FY3200S (arbitrary) function generator, which costs less than $100.
Use that to drive a power amplifier, attenuate the output and feed it back to the front-end error amplifier.

You might think you really need something, and will paralysed without it, but most of the time a little creativity will eliminate the problem.
 
  • #17
@anorlunda I think I've mentioned but just in case , for start I would want 1hz-25kHz for this I have some amplifiers to choose from so that doesn't factor in the budget, the power in this case would be limited by the capabilities of my amplifier so let's just say something along 1kW,

The voltage would be defined by the transformer , ofcourse I can control the voltage within a certain range with the amplifier so in any case I will make the transformer ratio such that I can achieve anything from a few volts to about 230v at my output. The maximum available current I would need to calculate from the maximum amplifier output and transformer turns ratio but I haven't done that at the moment. I think 5-10A depending on the voltage would be reasonable.
But as I said it's not so much about the maximum power available etc as that is just a matter of amplifier/transformer but more about how to control the output which is the hard part, so I'm mainly focused at that, at first I would use a 100w amp board that I have and once I would be able to control all the necessary parameters then I would think about higher power.
my budget is rather tight now, couple hundred bucks no more.

@Baluncore well as far as I've looked I only see the input on that generator used as frequency counter, you say it's also a feedback error amp to correct it's own output?
 
  • #18
Check out LabVIEW
 
  • #19
Just thought I'd throw this out there, but most quality signal generators control the output level by some type of feedback. They sample the output and compare it against a reference. A dumbed down way to describe it would be as a glorified opamp.
 
  • #20
artis said:
for start I would want 1hz-25kHz
the power in this case ... so let's just say something along 1kW,
my budget is rather tight now, couple hundred bucks no more.

I think you're looking to build a programmable AC power source.
Something like what Chroma sells, no?
https://www.chromausa.com/product/low-power-programmable-ac-source-61600/

Chroma is mostly interested in emulating wall outlets, and their various non-idealities & faults, so I don't think they have anything that matches your specs.

A supply able to track a 25KHz reference while sourcing 1KW for low $100s is going to be a tough project.
If you can pull it off then you should sell it. I know people who would buy it.
And what's going to power your amplifier? You might want to plan on a good amount of PSRR. :)

Maybe you can find a used AC power source on Ebay or something.

If it were me, and I had to do something custom, I would probably start with a PFC controller IC (like LT3798), and see if I could modify the default application by clever use of the Vin_sense and FB pins. That would be a pretty cheap way to go but it won't achieve tracking from REF->Vout @ 25KHz.

Please do let us know what you come up with. I'd be very interested in the solution.
 
  • #21
artis said:
well as far as I've looked I only see the input on that generator used as frequency counter, you say it's also a feedback error amp to correct it's own output?
No. The unloaded output of the signal generator is correct.
A power amplifier will have an error amplifier at it's input. You do not need a transformer in your power amplifier if you use a half bridge digital output.
 
  • #22
@Baluncore can you please elaborate on your last post?

@eq1 Well why do you think the power is the main difficulty here ? In theory I can have any power as long as the amplifier used and it's power supply can handle it, I think the difficulty is to have the ability to hold a certain waveform within a certain amplitude and frequency and hold those steady so that is the reason I am thinking about the possible control circuitry.

The Chroma device you linked to seems like something similar to what I am trying to do, only I am not sure whether it has the capability to control the waveform and switch between sine and square etc.
 
  • #23
artis said:
Baluncore can you please elaborate on your last post?
In what way?
You need to ask specific questions that identify the field you do not understand.
 
  • #24
you post wasn't so long as for me to be more specific , is the half bridge you referred to meant to be the amplifier output stage topology? also as for the error amplifier were you talking about the signal generator input ?
 
  • #25
artis said:
is the half bridge you referred to meant to be the amplifier output stage topology?
Yes.
artis said:
also as for the error amplifier were you talking about the signal generator input ?
No.
An accurate power amplifier will be built like an op-amp, with an error amplifier that compares the input with the attenuated output.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #26
Well then I would need two feedbacks, one built into the amplifier that compares the amp output with the input and the other being a more "global" feedback comparing the power going into my load with the waveform coming out of my function generator into my amplifier.

I think having an amplifier with opamp in it's input is not a big deal and can be done easily.
 
  • #27
artis said:
Well then I would need two feedbacks, one built into the amplifier that compares the amp output with the input and the other being a more "global" feedback comparing the power going into my load with the waveform coming out of my function generator into my amplifier.
Why do you need to make it so complex with extra global feedback. You need to source a voltage waveform, rarely a current waveform. The power will be decided by the load.
artis said:
I think having an amplifier with opamp in it's input is not a big deal and can be done easily.
It may be new to you, but the error amplifier is part of the negative feedback used to linearise power amplifiers. It is done all the time. The important thing is to make sure it does not cause instability.
 
  • #28
@artis It may be a bit late in the thread but, as this is supposed to be about Engineering, it would be a good idea to specify and discuss the actual nature of this Load. Why would one want to control the Power Supply waveform and would Voltage or Current control be the better strategy? What is the device - or is this just a vague thought experiment which has been seized by the PF pack and chased all round the forest of ideas?
Until the actual requirement (with numbers!) is specified, there is no answer, however much fun we may be having with the question. We've each been answer our own version of the question, so far.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
  • #29
@sophiecentaur a bit skeptical and critical as usual , welcome :)

Well the idea is as I said to have a power supply with which I can load different devices with a variable amplitude/frequency waveform , say I want to test the performance of an smps transformer or in another case to attach a induction heater coil and drive about 22kHz through it and heat up a pipe etc.
Building a separate supply for each case is time consuming and I see no problem why I couldn't just have a capable amplifier hooked up to a function generator and do the same and to have a great deal of tuning margin.
I was only worried about the feedback and control capability because obviously the output amplitude and frequency will change with different loads and even on the same load with change in frequency so I need a way to regulate these things like for example to keep the amplitude constant while frequency is increased where I would need to increase voltage etc.

I could do this by hand but having a control board do this is much better
 
  • #30
artis said:
...obviously the output amplitude and frequency will change with different loads and even on the same load with change in frequency...
Maybe I'm not getting this, but just how do you expect the load to be able to change the frequency of your function generator?
 
  • #31
Also never be too hasty to go down the digital path. Analog could be cheaper and easier.

For completeness I mention Mr Hewlett's wonderful master's thesis invention with the nonlinear (light bulb) feedback.

https://people.ohio.edu/postr/bapix/HP200CD.htm

For harmonic waveforms at least, an oscilloscope and a knob to turn is often a good solution
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron
  • #32
pardon , @Averagesupernova I meant that with changing frequency the output amplitude will vary with different loads and even with the same load.
 
  • #33
artis said:
@sophiecentaur a bit skeptical and critical as usual , welcome :)

:smile::smile::smile:
Only critical about the lack of real direction in the thread. It seems to me that the OP is after a box with two terminals (or more?) that will provide any required volts and current to suit any load that may be chosen. Is not the normal approach for the 'consumer' appliance to present a load that can be fed from a general purpose Power Supply (usually a nominal constant Voltage)? The internal power regulator would expect to do the 'clever stuff' to deal with the peculiar requirements of any devices that it feeds inside the box. To invent the sort of device that the OP seems to be after would be needlessly hard and would be sure to fall short in some way. It would be like the marvellous medicines that are advertised on the net to sort out your arthritis, impotence, shortness of breath and dyspepsia, all in the same bottle. But you would still need another bottle to deal with your sore throat or piles. One job, done properly and efficiently, is surely the essence of good design.
 
  • #34
sophiecentaur said:
It seems to me that the OP is after a box with two terminals (or more?) that will provide any required volts and current to suit any load that may be chosen.
It seems that way. Design experience teaches that there are trade-offs in the real world. Convenience of use and max number of applications possible do not generally occur simultaneously.
 
  • #35
you know when I come to think of it I actually just need voltage (amplitude) and phase shift feedback, because after all i am using an amplifier as my source not a mechanical generator where an increase in load results in a slight decrease in rpm/frequency which then needs to be adjusted for , in my case as long as the amplifier supply power doesn't sag my frequency should stay constant and as set by the amplifier input signal, at least I think so...?

So basically depending on the load output voltage will change , current will be then determined by the load and also will be phase shift so if I can keep voltage constant and compensate for phase shift if it gets too large then I think I'm okay.So the logic goes like this. I set a fixed frequency and the feedback control maintains fixed voltage at that frequency , if I set a new frequency value the frequency rises and the feedback then sets the voltage again or adjusts it given that my voltage value isn't changed.
Additionally I should adjust for phase shift if necessary.
 
  • #36
I still don't understand what you'll adjust phase shift for. Also, you never answered the question, "Phase shift of what relative to what?"
 
  • #37
sophiecentaur said:
It would be like the marvellous medicines that are advertised on the net to sort out your arthritis, impotence, shortness of breath and dyspepsia, all in the same bottle.

💊 Can I get a citation here?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G and sophiecentaur
  • #38
The phase shift I simply thought to be the current either lagging or leading , say I attach a very inductive load and the current starts to lag , then the idea is to simply adjust the signal waveform driving the amplifier so that the phase shift is minimized .

Ok to be honest I haven't put all of this together and maybe I'm just making a fool of myself here , but at least in theory shouldn't that be possible?

Also was I right in saying that since I'm driving my load with an amplifier even under varying load conditions where the output voltage increases/decreases the frequency should stay fixed as it it set by the input signal?
 
  • #39
artis said:
say I attach a very inductive load and the current starts to lag
It doesn't "start to lag" because the word Lag can only apply to the steady state. You connect the load and then you wait until it's all settled down. Only then can you measure a meaningful Lag.
artis said:
the frequency should stay fixed as it it set by the input signal?
One way (the only one) that you can cause the output frequency to be different from the input frequency (say, lower) is to separate the source from the output with a steadily increasing distance (increasing time lag as the ambulance speeds away from you). Then you have the Doppler effect at work. There is no way that the output frequency of a static setup can be different from the input frequency. Ask yourself at which point in the circuit would the voltage be going up and down at a different rate from the input voltage? Amplitude continuity is always maintained across an interface.
There are signal processors that can achieve this, though - the easiest to describe is the old tape loop with several read heads on a wheel which rotates faster of slower than the tape speed, the outputs from the heads are switched to select the head that happens to be scanning over the tape. This is really just the Doppler shift at work. Other (digital) methods are available but none of this is relevant to the simple source / load system that's been suggested.
 
  • #40
hutchphd said:
💊 Can I get a citation here?
You can actually write your own and someone, somewhere will read and believe it. :smile:
 
  • Sad
  • Like
Likes Tom.G and hutchphd
  • #41
artis said:
The phase shift I simply thought to be the current either lagging or leading , say I attach a very inductive load and the current starts to lag , then the idea is to simply adjust the signal waveform driving the amplifier so that the phase shift is minimized .

OK to be honest I haven't put all of this together and maybe I'm just making a fool of myself here , but at least in theory shouldn't that be possible?
No. In theory it is not possible. That's what we have been trying to tell you.

If you connect a pure resistive load, the phase between V and I will be zero.
If you connect a pure inductive load, the phase between V and I will by 90 degrees.
If you connect a pure capacitive load, the phase between V and I will be 90 degrees the other direction.

The voltage source can do nothing to change that. There is nothing to adjust. The signal source can't make an inductor into a resistor.
 
  • #42
@sophiecentaur , thanks that's what I thought , an amplifier will have a fixed frequency just a varying output amplitude under a changing load impedance , a mechanical generator would change it's frequency because with more load the rpm would decrease and need to be adjusted.@anorlunda hey, I messed up terribly and only now I understood that when I said phase shift I was actually thinking just controlling the shape of the output waveform itself not the waveform of the voltage vs current as it would change under a different type of load (inductive/capacitive or reactive)
when you said that an inductor would never perform as a resistor I though damn sure makes sense ,

so surely I would not be able to undo the phase shift present within an inductor , what I wanted to is to simply simulate a capacitor added to an inductor , although I assume that would need to be done the old fashioned way as to connect a physical cap in the output much like power stations switching on capacitor banks to compensate for overly lagging current , am I now thinking correctly?

So I guess what I am asking is , how could one simulate the added capacitor effect to an inductive load simply by having an amplifier and an inductive load without a real capacitor , is that even possible ?IIRC a capacitor added to an inductor like an induction motor doesn't actually decrease the total lag of current or reactive power it just forms a loop where these reactive currents circulate between the cap and motor instead of them circulating from the motor back to grid etc ?
 
  • #43
I'm afraid your misconception is more basic. Consider the following circuit.

1584308962065.png


Let Z be an impedance constructed of any combination of R, L and C you please, series and/or parallel connections, as many passive R, L, C components as you please. The voltage measured across Z is V, and the current through Z is I.

Let S be a source. It could be anything, a mains plug, a signal generator, a battery , or whatever. We'll exclude DC, but S is a periodic signal of any shape.

Z and S are connected only via the two terminals (black dots).

Now, if you allow V, I and Z to be complex numbers, Ohm's Law determines the relationship ##\frac{V}{I}=Z## between voltage and current. Nothing that S does can change that.

If S is not a sine wave, then it can be represented as a Fourier Series which has several harmonic frequencies. ##\frac{V}{I}=Z## applies separately to each harmonic, and the total is the sum of all harmonics. Changing the fundamental frequency of S can change Z, but still ##\frac{V}{I}=Z## . The relationship between V and I depends on Z, not S. Changing the waveform of S, changing the phase angle of S relative to some external reference does not change ##\frac{V}{I}=Z##.

So, what you say your objective is, to change the relationship between I and V using adjustments in S is theoretically impossible. That can be done only by changing the contents of the box Z. I hope that I'm making the message clear.
 

Attachments

  • 1584308961660.png
    1584308961660.png
    6 KB · Views: 216
  • #44
yes, you made this clear , thanks for the explanation.
but my question about the classical case of an capacitor connected to an induction motor is true isn't it ? where you basically control how far in the grid the "Z" imposed phase shift goes , that's like PFC correction in smps , one cannot change the phase shift of the mains input rectifier or the power of the switches being taken mostly from the peaks of the rectified sine due to stored charge in capacitors but the PFC circuit changes the properties of this connected Z load as to make it more resistive in nature ?maybe a little different question , but then increasing voltage through an inductive or reactive load both increases the real power flowing in the circuit as well as reactive but the proportion by which both increase is determined by the phase angle and at some phase angle (45?) both real and reactive increase at the same rate ?
 
  • #45
artis said:
maybe a little different question , but then increasing voltage through an inductive or reactive load both increases the real power flowing in the circuit as well as reactive but the proportion by which both increase is determined by the phase angle and at some phase angle (45?) both real and reactive increase at the same rate ?
Phase is independent of voltage in a linear system.
Now you are just confusing things by writing one long misinterpretable sentence.
Sit down with a book on AC theory and write out the equations.
You will be able to ask more sensible questions once you understand the concepts.
 
  • #46
artis said:
maybe a little different question , but then increasing voltage through an inductive or reactive load both increases the real power flowing in the circuit as well as reactive but the proportion by which both increase is determined by the phase angle and at some phase angle (45?) both real and reactive increase at the same rate ?
I was contemplating an answer to this when I read @Baluncore 's post, above - which I totally endorse. The above quote is a great demonstration of how 'home brewed' personal theories can lead you into more nonsensical questions and answers.

All elementary 'AC Theory' is based on linear generators and Loads so changing the supply volts cannot do anything to change the IMPEDANCES in the circuit.

You really should read some basic texts and do some graft to get a hold of this topic, instead of trying to get there by Q and A which, as PF often points out, is not a way to learn anything technical. Just being apologetic about asking bad questions is not excuse, either, if you really want to find out stuff.
 
Back
Top