HelpResting membrane potential, hyperpolrization ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the forces involved in potassium (K+) channels during resting membrane potential and hyperpolarization. Key points include the role of concentration gradients and electrical forces in maintaining resting potential, as well as how these forces change during hyperpolarization. Participants emphasize the importance of the Nernst equation in calculating equilibrium potential for K+. The urgency of the request highlights the need for clarity in explaining these concepts. Overall, the discussion aims to clarify the mechanisms behind K+ channel behavior in different membrane states.
lillia~
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi

i was wondering if you could help me answering this question please ..

"compare between forces that involved in the K+ channel during resting membrane potential and hyperpolrization" ?

I'm sorry but i need to know the answer ASAP ..

:biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi lillia~

We have a homework forum, you should provide us with the following information:

Homework Statement





Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top