Hemodynamics Homework Help, Works shown

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnq2k7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Works
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the arterial tree using a branching network where vessel diameters relate through the cube law. Participants seek assistance with three specific problems: proving the diameter ratio formula, demonstrating that 35 generations are needed to transition from the aorta to capillaries, and deriving the mean transit time for blood flow. The initial proof for part a is discussed, suggesting that the ratio can be shown through recursive relationships. For part b, users are encouraged to substitute known values for diameters to validate the number of generations required. The conversation highlights confusion around deriving the mean transit time and the specific parameters in the original equation.
johnq2k7
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Model the arterial tree as a simple branching network in which each junction is composed of a parent vessel and daughter vessels, each having a diameter related to the parent's via the cube law (D_n-1)^3= (D_n*a)^3 + (D_n*b)^3 which is approx. equal to 2*(D_n)^3

a.) Show that D_n/D_0= 2^(-n/3)

b.) Show that 35 generations are required to model the arterial tree from aorta (D_0=2.6 cm) to the capillaries (D_34=10 um)


c.) Derive a formula for the mean transit time (ie vessel length divded by mean velociity) for an individual vessel. Based on this formula, how long does the model suggest it would take for blood to go from the aorta to the capillaries?



My work:


a.) since

(D_n-1)^3 is approximately equal to 2*(D_n)^3

therefore,

(D_n-1/D_n)^3= 2

therefore i Dn/Do= 2^(-n/3)

I'm not sure

i need help with the other questions, I'm confused how use this equation to solve the problem?








 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnq2k7 said:
Model the arterial tree as a simple branching network in which each junction is composed of a parent vessel and daughter vessels, each having a diameter related to the parent's via the cube law (D_n-1)^3= (D_n*a)^3 + (D_n*b)^3 which is approx. equal to 2*(D_n)^3

a.) Show that D_n/D_0= 2^(-n/3)

b.) Show that 35 generations are required to model the arterial tree from aorta (D_0=2.6 cm) to the capillaries (D_34=10 um)


c.) Derive a formula for the mean transit time (ie vessel length divded by mean velociity) for an individual vessel. Based on this formula, how long does the model suggest it would take for blood to go from the aorta to the capillaries?



My work:


a.) since

(D_n-1)^3 is approximately equal to 2*(D_n)^3

therefore,

(D_n-1/D_n)^3= 2

therefore i Dn/Do= 2^(-n/3)

I'm not sure

i need help with the other questions, I'm confused how use this equation to solve the problem?

I'd guess that you just plug in n=34, n=35, n=36 into the equation, and show that you need at least n=35 in order to get the large ratio in vessel sizes that they give in the question.
 
How do you prove part a.) properly though, and for part c.) how do u derive the mean transit time equation from the information?

please help
 
johnq2k7 said:
How do you prove part a.) properly though, and for part c.) how do u derive the mean transit time equation from the information?

please help

What are a and b in the original equation? Are they somehow constrained to be close to 1 each, and that's why the simplified approximation works?

For the proof, I'd try doing something like this...

{D_{n-1}}^3 = 2 {D_n}^3

So

{D_0}^3 = 2 {D_1}^3

{D_1}^3 = 2 {D_2}^3

{D_2}^3 = 2 {D_3}^3

etc., So

{D_0}^3 = 2 {D_1}^3 = 2^2 {D_2}^3 = 2^3 {D_3}^3 = ... = 2^n {D_n}^3

The rest of the proof should follow. Is that what you mean?

And what does your text say about flow rate equations. There must be more information that you use to solve that part?
 
How about part b.)

Do you simply

use, D_0= 2.6 cm

D(34)= 10 um

and substitute

(D_0)^3 / (2^34)= 10 um

How do you prove it?

I'm sort of confused?
 
johnq2k7 said:
How about part b.)

Do you simply

use, D_0= 2.6 cm

D(34)= 10 um

and substitute

(D_0)^3 / (2^34)= 10 um

How do you prove it?

I'm sort of confused?

I'd said:
berkeman said:
I'd guess that you just plug in n=34, n=35, n=36 into the equation, and show that you need at least n=35 in order to get the large ratio in vessel sizes that they give in the question.


So what is the ratio of the 2.6cm and 10um? What is the ratio of the following?

\frac{{D_0}^3}{{D_{33}}^3}

\frac{{D_0}^3}{{D_{34}}^3}

\frac{{D_0}^3}{{D_{35}}^3}
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top