Hermitian conjugate of a Hermitian Conjugate

teaJ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I know that (A\mp )\mp =A . Where A is an Hermitian operator How does one go about proving this through the standard integral to find Hermitian adjoint operators?

I should mention, I don't want anyone to just flat out show me step by step how to do it. I'd just like a solid starting place.

\int (A\mp \psi*) \varphi dx = \int (\psi*)A\varphi dx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Edited with the question. Forums are difficult sometimes :)
 
teaJ said:
I know that (A\mp )\mp =A . Where A is an Hermitian operator How does one go about proving this through the standard integral to find Hermitian adjoint operators?

I should mention, I don't want anyone to just flat out show me step by step how to do it. I'd just like a solid starting place.

\int (A\mp \psi*) \varphi dx = \int (\psi*)A\varphi dx

I prefer \dagger for Hermitian conjugate. Anyway...

Writing \langle \psi|\phi \rangle for \int \psi^* \phi dx, we have the definition of A^\dagger:

Equation 1: \langle A^\dagger \psi | \phi \rangle = \langle \psi | A \phi \rangle

But we also have a fact about inner products:

Equation 2: \langle X | Y \rangle^* = \langle Y | X \rangle.

Now, apply equation 2 to both sides of equation 1 to get another fact about Hermitian conjugates.
 
teaJ said:
I know that (A\mp )\mp =A . Where A is an Hermitian operator
That's not true. An operator is hermitian or synonymously symetric, if ##\langle A^\dagger \phi|\psi\rangle =\langle \phi| A\psi \rangle ## for ## \phi,\; \psi \in \mathcal{D}(A)##. However, the domain of ##A^\dagger ## may be larger than that of A, ##\mathcal{D}(A)\subset \mathcal{D}(A^\dagger)## and then also ##\mathcal{D}(A)\subset \mathcal{D}(A^{\dagger \dagger})##. However if A is self adjoint, i.e. if additionally ##\mathcal{D}(A)=\mathcal{D}(A^\dagger)## then also ##\mathcal{D}(A)=\mathcal{D}(A^{\dagger \dagger})##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top