Hessian matrix of potential energy in electrostatic system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Hessian matrix of potential energy in a 2D electrostatic system with distributed charges. The user describes their approach using Poisson's equation to determine charge density and potential distribution, leading to the formulation of the Hessian matrix H(N) based on second-order partial derivatives of potential energy N. They correctly identify the diagonal elements of H(N) as related to charge quantity and local density, while noting that off-diagonal elements require Coulomb's law. The user seeks clarification on the properties of H(N), specifically its symmetry and positive definiteness, as well as methods for approximating H(N) when scaling the system with additional charges. The discussion invites feedback and suggestions for improving their understanding and calculations.
francesco_ljw
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone:

I am rookie in classical physics and first-time PF user so please forgive me if I am making mistakes here. My current project needs some guidance from physics and I am describing the problem, my understanding and question as below.

I have an independent electrostatic system with positive and negative charges distributed on a 2D plane. The plane is discretized into small sub-rectangles to calculate the charge density and get the field and potential distribution using Poisson equation, so is the total potential energy N. Location of each charge c (suppose to be x(c)) determines N. Now I need to calculate the Hessian matrix (2nd-order partial differentiation) of N, H(N), with respect to each x(c). To me, as ∂^2 N /∂ x(c)^2 = -q(c)D(c), we get the diagonal elements of H(N), where q(c) is the quantity of charge and D(c) is the local density; the off-diagonal elements need to be calculated using Coulomb's law.

Please correct me if there is any mistake in the above, e.g., miscalculation of H(N), as well as others. If all is correct, my question is (1) what kind of properties would H(N) have (I assume it would be symmetric, but would it be positive definite also)? (2) if we scale up the system with more charges, is there a fast way to approximate H(N)?

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody has ideas?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top