Hexagonal Closest Packed Unit Cell Height

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the height of a hexagonal closest packed unit cell as a function of the sphere radius. Attempts to use trigonometry to find the height based on diagonal distances from the top atom to middle ones were unsuccessful. Key insights include recognizing that atoms in the middle plane are positioned directly above the centroids of the triangles formed by the basal plane atoms. The relationship between the height and the radius can be established using Pythagorean theorem and packing efficiency, leading to a formula involving the volume of spheres within the unit cell. Visual aids and further clarification on geometric relationships are suggested to assist in understanding the derivation.
Sculptured
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
My attempts to derive the height as a function of radius of the spheres packing the unit cell have failed. The best attempt so far was to create a diagonal line from the top atom to one of the middle ones. With that distance I thought I could use trig to find the component parallel to the height and multiply by two. Of course that didn't work. Any hints or suggestions? Even good 3d visualizations would help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The trick is in realizing that the middle plane of atoms occupy positions directly above the centroids of the triangles in the base plane. This follows directly from a symmetry argument.

#1. Each basal plane has nearest neighbor atoms making equilateral triangles. So, a=2R (where R is the sphere radius).

#2. Each atom at height c/2 above the basal plane is positioned directly above the centroid of the triangles in the base plane. For an equilatreral triangle, the distance from a vertex to the centroid is two-thirds the length of the median.

#3. Each atom in the base plane has a nearest neighbor in this middle plane. So, the distance from the corner atom in the base plane to the nearby atom in the mid-plane is 2R.

#4. Finally, use Pythagoras to write (2R)^2 = (c/2)^2 + (dist. calculated in #2)^2. That should take you to the required ratio.
 
I tried to find it with the help of packing efficiency (i.e. 0.74). the number of contributing spheres inside one unit cell is 6. therefore volume of 6 spheres/volume of hexagonal unit cell=0.74
volume of hexagonal unit cell is 6*sqrt(3)*r*r*h
then u will get answer of "h".
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top