What Is Containing Our Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sorry!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hey
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the universe and what it is contained in, with participants suggesting that the universe is not contained within anything. It is proposed that the universe's curvature is intrinsic and that if it is an n-dimensional universe, it cannot be contained in a higher-dimensional space. Questions arise about how the universe can expand if it is not contained, leading to references to Stephen Hawking's 'no boundary condition' as a plausible explanation for a finite yet unbounded universe. The conversation reflects on the complexities of understanding the universe's structure and expansion. Ultimately, the nature of the universe remains a profound mystery.
Sorry!
Messages
416
Reaction score
0
It's been on my mind lately. Do we have any idea of what our universe is contained in? Whats containing it even?


Is this question silly and not possible to know about??
 
Space news on Phys.org
Sorry! said:
Do we have any idea of what our universe is contained in? Whats containing it even?

Hi Sorry! :smile:

It's not contained in anything.

Its curvature is intrinsic.

If it's an n-dimensional universe, then it's not contained in an (n+1)-dimensional universe (or higher) …

the universe is all there is. :wink:
 
So then how can it continue to expand? Wouldn't it need to get 'bigger' in order to keep expanding?
 
Google on the 'no boundary condition'. Stephen Hawking provides a plausible explanation for a universe that is finite, but, unbounded.
 
ok thanks chronos
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top