Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Higgs particle

  1. Jul 3, 2007 #1
    I just read this book on the Standard Model. It goes over most things very briefly and one thing it explained badly was the higgs particle. Why exactly does it give every other massive particle mass? The Higgs field from a single particle would be negligible from far away right? If we managed to create a Higgs particle would all the particles around it become more massive? Or are their virtual higgs particles everywhere?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 3, 2007 #2

    mjsd

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    badly explained? mm... what level is this? you sure need some advanced physics to understand it.
     
  4. Jul 3, 2007 #3

    Haelfix

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Try wikipedia. Very roughly (and sloppily) the gist is that most particles should theoretically be massless. To escape this disaster, and to make progress on the electroweak side of things (which at the time there was growing evidence for), several people invoked and utilized the Higgs mechanism. Whereby several terms in the lagrangian (one from symmetry breaking, the other a pure massless gauge term) conspire to add up and unite in such a way that a single new mass term appears. Happily, people then identify these new mass terms with all the known particles and the standard model was born.

    Of course this neccessarily requires that symmetry breaking term to be present (also called a Goldstone boson), and this was called the Higgs particle.
     
  5. Jul 3, 2007 #4
    yea thats the part I understand. I understand the basic concept. What I dont really get is the mechanism by which the higgs particle gives the other particles mass. The way it was explained in the book is that because the field of the particle is everywhere in space (by quantum field theory), when it breaks symmetry it "drags" the particles it interacts with it and makes their fields oscillate, giving them mass. However particle fields arent uniform throughout space. Because of this my first reaction was that particles closer to a higgs particle would be more massive than ones farther away. Obviously this isnt true so Im curious what I did wrong.
     
  6. Jul 3, 2007 #5

    Haelfix

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yea, its a little bit off to think too seriously about the 'dragging particles through space, causing friction --> causing mass'. Its right in a sense, but can lead to misleading intuition.

    I prefer to see it mathematically. After you have exploited local gauge invariance, and spontaneously broken the symmetry, and with a convenient choice of gauge. You are simply left with a massive scalar (the higgs) and a massive gauge field (what we wanted to give mass too).

    These are no different than any other particle, they just are what they are.

    The intuition is in a sense just a mirage, as we are simply free to transform it away into something more familiar and banal. Essentially the degree of freedom of the Goldstone boson is transformed into extra polarization degrees of freedom for the now massive gauge field. This happens everywhere (as it must, by local gauge invariance)

    Thats about as much as I can explain with words I think
     
  7. Mar 13, 2011 #6
    the particles react with the higgs field in a way that gives them mass
     
  8. Mar 13, 2011 #7

    Vanadium 50

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2015 Award

    This one is only four years old.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Higgs particle
  1. Higgs Particle (Replies: 20)

  2. Higgs particles (Replies: 2)

  3. Higgs particle (Replies: 1)

Loading...