High n transitions (eg 109-108) are observed in excited He...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Excited Observed
Poirot
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Transitions between n=109 to n=108 have been observed in highly excited helium atoms and in this case the Bohr model is a valid approximation. Why is this?

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having some problems with this question and it probably comes down to a lack of understanding.
I think it may be because the electron that undergoes this transition is so far from the nucleus/the other e- that we can assume they don't interact with one another (such that Bohr model is valid) but I'm not overly sure/don't understand enough.

Any help would be greatly appreciated thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The other electron is near the nucleus, as you said. What charge does the nucleus have? What charge does the combination of nucleus plus inner electron have? The two electrons will interact, but the interaction will be one of a Coulomb type interaction, where the inner electron is combined with the nucleus rather than moving freely in a somewhat unpredictable manner. If you were to quantify the Bohr model, to compute the wavelength of this transition, what ## Z ## (atomic number of nucleus) would you use? Additional item, does the increased mass of the nucleus have any appreciable effect? What is the mass that is used in the Bohr model? ## \\ ## Note: The Bohr atom model uses three equations: (c.g.s. units) 1) Angular momentum ## L=mvr=n \hbar ## ## \ ## 2) Coulomb force =centripetal force for circular motion ## Ze^2/r^2=mv^2/r ## ##\ ## 3) Energy ## E_n=(1/2)mv^2-Ze^2/r ##. Solve for unknowns ## E_n, \, v, \, r ##. Are these equations equally valid for this modified helium atom as they are for a hydrogen atom?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top