High rez electromagnetic field mapping

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of obtaining detailed electromagnetic field maps from crystalized metal samples. The initial approach using conductivity paper and Ag ink yielded unsatisfactory results, prompting a search for more precise methods, including 3D mapping. Suggestions include enlisting experts in simulation programs for Finite Element problems and exploring available software packages for simulations. There is uncertainty about common devices used in physics for such measurements, and the need for a more precise 2D mapping technique is highlighted. The ultimate goal is to differentiate between crystalized and non-crystalized samples based on their electromagnetic signatures.
veld
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Greetings, I am currently working on an interesting experiment on crystalized metal and I need to find a way to get a detailed map of an electromagnetic field when current is induced into a metal sample. I found the basic 2D approach of using conductivity paper and Ag ink to be useless as it produces very crude results. I am looking for a way to yield more detail with fine lines that will show greater characteristics from my sample. A 3D map would be a good start I would think. I also would think such a fine mapping would be sensitive to environmental fields such as the Earths magnetic field, so I am guessing the experiment will need to be shielded in some way. Does anyone know how I can do this? Sorry I am not a physicist so I am not familiar what is used when they need to do this type of work. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an extremely complex problem, there is no standard way of performing this type of measurement.

The best you might be able to do is enlist the help of someone with a bit of expertise in writing simulation programs for Finite Element problems. There may also be software packages available that can also perform this kind of simulation.

Claude.
 
Thanks Claude for the reply.

I would think there was some common device used in physics to collect a 3D image of EM fields, but I guess I am wrong. I am sure the large universities must have such a method or device to do this.

Well then is there a device that can do a more precise 2D mapping?
 
I use a technique called SNOM to measure optical electromagnetic fields, however this wouldn't be suitable for DC fields. How small do you need the resolution to be?

Claude.
 
Good question, I am really not sure how detailed ill need. My objective is to keep trying better and better measurements until I can tell the difference between a crystalized and non crystalized sample from just its EM signature.
-Dan
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top