High Rez EMF Mapping: Seeking Advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter veld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Mapping
veld
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Greetings, This was posted in the Classic Physics section, reposted here in Quantum section in case someone here may have some experience in EMF mapping.

I am currently working on an interesting experiment on crystalized metal and I need to find a way to get a detailed map of an electromagnetic field when DC current is induced into a metal sample. I found the basic 2D approach of using conductivity paper and Ag ink to be useless as it produces very crude results. I am looking for a way to yield more detail with fine lines that will show greater characteristics from my sample. A 3D map would be a good start I would think. I also would think such a fine mapping would be sensitive to environmental fields such as the Earths magnetic field, so I am guessing the experiment will need to be shielded in some way. My objective is to be able to differentiate between a crystalized and non crystalized sample based on its EMF signature, that is if its possible.

Does anyone know of a way EMF's are mapped more precisely 2D or 3D? Sorry I am not a physicist so I am not familiar what is used in this type of work. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello, it sounds like you are working on a fascinating experiment! I am not an expert in EMF mapping, but I do have some suggestions that may be helpful.

First, have you considered using a magnetic field probe? These probes are designed specifically for mapping magnetic fields and can provide more detailed and accurate results compared to using conductivity paper and ink. They can also be used in 2D and 3D mapping.

Additionally, if you are concerned about environmental fields interfering with your results, you can use a Faraday cage to shield your experiment. This will help to minimize any external electromagnetic interference.

Another option is to use a computer program to model and simulate the EMF field. This can provide a more precise and detailed map of the field without the need for physical mapping.

I hope these suggestions are helpful. Best of luck with your experiment!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top