High-voltage low-amperage current through the human body

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of high-voltage, low-amperage current passing through the human body, exploring the relationship between voltage, amperage, and resistance, as well as the physiological impacts of electrical shock. Participants examine theoretical and practical implications, safety concerns, and the mechanics of electrical conduction through the body.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that amperage is determined by voltage and resistance, questioning why high voltage can result in low amperage without lethal consequences.
  • It is noted that the dry epidermis has high resistance, which limits current flow, while factors like sweat or skin abrasion can lower resistance and increase danger.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential lethality of high-voltage, low-current scenarios, with references to devices like AEDs that use similar principles.
  • Some participants propose that high voltage may not be necessary for lethality if sufficient amperage can be achieved through other means, such as bypassing the skin.
  • There is mention of specific current thresholds that can lead to dangerous situations, including the concept of microshock and its implications for heart fibrillation.
  • Participants express confusion over the distinction between voltage and amperage in terms of their roles in electrical shock severity, with some seeking clarification on why voltage is emphasized separately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the relationship between voltage, amperage, and resistance, with no consensus reached on the implications of high-voltage, low-amperage scenarios or the specific thresholds for danger.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the variability of resistance in the human body, the dependence on skin condition, and the unresolved nature of specific current thresholds that lead to lethal outcomes.

fawk3s
Messages
341
Reaction score
1
I=V/R, so the amperage is determined by the voltage and the resistance of the human body, right?
But yet it is possible to have a high voltage but low amperage current go through you, say you grabbing 2 electrodes which have the a high voltage between them. How come the amperage is low and doesn't kill you, but the higher the voltage the more it hurts?

Thanks in advance,
fawk3s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fawk3s said:
I=V/R, so the amperage is determined by the voltage and the resistance of the human body, right?
But yet it is possible to have a high voltage but low amperage current go through you, say you grabbing 2 electrodes which have the a high voltage between them. How come the amperage is low and doesn't kill you, but the higher the voltage the more it hurts?

Thanks in advance,
fawk3s

The dry epidermis (outer layer of your skin) has relatively high resistance, so that will help to limit the current.

If your hands are sweaty, or if you use electrodes with good coatings (or abrade the epidermis), that gives you lower resistance access to the core of the body, and the core of the body has much lower resistance than the dry epidermis.
 
Careful when you try this experiment... High-voltage fairly-low current is what is produced by the AED devices used to kick-start arrhythmic hearts...

I think very-low current limiting would be in order, but I don't offhand know what the limit should be. Very low currents may just conduct through your skin and not penetrate the body -- especially if you do not break the skin with the electrodes. Electrical currents probably cause neurons to fire making for pain response, again offhand I'm not sure of the mechanism. They can also create heat leading to burns.
 
I can think of a few ways of setting up the circuit where a relatively high voltage would create a low amperage inside your body. But is high voltage necessary for getting killed? Or is there a way a fairly low voltage can cause a high enough amperage to kill you, without your skin being abraded?
 
Lets be a little careful discussing this, folks. Remember the issue with discussing dangerous activities on the PF...
 
Oh no, I aint thinking of trying it out. I am just curious if its possible.
 
The wiki "Electric Shock" page is illuminating... It says without body penetration 1ma can be felt and 100ma is considered very dangerous. Then this:
If an electrical circuit is established by electrodes introduced in the body, bypassing the skin, then the potential for lethality is much higher if a circuit though the heart is established. This is known as a microshock. Currents of only 10 µA can be sufficient to cause fibrillation in this case.

and OSHA has a nice summary...who would expect that from a govt agency?

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/construction/electrical_incidents/eleccurrent.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
R is a variable, ranging from a very low value (you are mostly a bag of salt water) to a high Megaohm value (dry skin). A high enough voltage can carbonize a path through the skin, leading to an overall low resistance. Enough current through body parts such as the heart or brain can kill you - only a handful of milliamps are enough... There are also current thresholds, the values I don't recall, which make it impossible to 'let go' of a live wire... Obviously, the higher the voltage, the easier it is to get to the dangerous current levels..
 
schip666! said:
The wiki "Electric Shock" page is illuminating... It says without body penetration 1ma can be felt and 100ma is considered very dangerous. Then this:


and OSHA has a nice summary...who would expect that from a govt agency?

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/construction/electrical_incidents/eleccurrent.html"

Under "Other factors that may affect the severity of the shock" is the voltage of the current.
I still fail to fully comprehend why that is. Amps are what do the damage (as they are under the primary causes of shock on that page aswell) and voltage with resistance are only what determine the amps. So why is "the voltage of the current" brought out separatedly when the only thing it does is determine the amps, which actually do the damage?

Thanks in advance,
fawk3s
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
fawk3s said:
So why is "the voltage of the current" brought out separatedly when the only thing it does is determine the amps, which actually do the damage?
fawk3s

I think you've got the idea. Higher voltage means higher current through the same resistance. So one needs to be more careful around higher-voltages. You can grab both terminals of a 12v car battery and probably not feel anything because of the high resistance of your fairly-dry skin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
schip666! said:
The wiki "Electric Shock" page is illuminating... It says without body penetration 1ma can be felt and 100ma is considered very dangerous. Then this:


and OSHA has a nice summary...who would expect that from a govt agency?

http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/construction/electrical_incidents/eleccurrent.html"

Great info, thanks schip. I'm going to go ahead and close this thread now. The safety warnings in the links above are a good way to end this thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
31K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K