Mk
- 2,039
- 4
Mount Everest is the highest mountain according to sea level, but can we know if there has ever been a higher mountain in geological history?
mgb_phys said:You can also work out the maximum possible height of a mountain from rock strength.
It's around h = 16 \gamma / \rho g where \gamma is young's modulus and \rho is density
which gives roughly the same height as Everest.
Only if it was a specific and unlikely shape (exponential curve - so mass above a certain level is less than the mass below)LURCH said:I don't think this really works, because a wider mountain could be taller.
Yes Mauna Kea is slightly higher from it's base (underwater) - but it's only an estimate, the factor depends on the shape of the mountain. It can also behigher if there is somthing to stop the base spreading out.Also because Everst is only the tallest according to sea level,
Generally the himalayas are in isostatic equilibrium, Everest is being worn down by erosion but the reduced weight means it floats up and maintains roughly the same height.However, you could simply check to see if Everest is currently being thrust up. If it isn't, then it's being worn down, so there was a mountain higher than Everest; Everest!
What values did you use to find roughly the same height as Everest?mgb_phys said:You can also work out the maximum possible height of a mountain from rock strength.
It's around h = 16 \gamma / \rho g where \gamma is young's modulus and \rho is density
which gives roughly the same height as Everest.