Highschool electronics- Illumination

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring light intensity in lux using a light-dependent resistor (LDR) in a school experiment. The experiment involved measuring voltage drop, current, and resistance of the LDR at varying distances from a light globe. It emphasizes the challenge of calibrating the LDR to convert resistance readings into lux measurements. A calibration curve is suggested as a method to relate resistance to illumination, although it requires known light sources or a lux meter for accuracy. Borrowing a lux meter is recommended for proper calibration of the LDR.
physics_bro
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have done an experiment at school, where the voltage drop across an LDR was measured at varying light intensities. The light intensity was determined by the distance of a light globe from the LDR (the light globe was part of an external circuit). Also the current flowing through the LDR circuit was measured at each distance.

Bacically I have voltage drop across LDR, current in circuit, distance of globe from ldr and resistance of LDR using ohm's law.
oh yeh and i have the wattage of the globe and its supply voltage
Is it possible to calulate the light intensity in lux by using an equation or did this have to be measured using a lux meter?

I realize the distance of the light globe from the LDR is effectively the light intensity, but i need it to be in lux...


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the age old problem of calibrating an instrument. Meaning that you have to draw a calibration curve of illumination in lux against the resistance of you device.

This can either be done with sources of known illumination (not a recommended procedure) or using another measurement device that will give you the readings in lux (not very helpfull is it!).

Try and borrow a lux meter from a photographer to calibrate your resistor.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top