Hinged lever held by a string - Problem regarding forces

AI Thread Summary
When analyzing a hinged lever held by a string, the intersection of the contact force from the wall and the tension in the string will always align directly above the load's center, regardless of the load's position. This phenomenon is supported by a theorem in mechanics stating that for a body in static equilibrium, the lines of action of three forces must intersect at a single point or be parallel. The weight of the load acts as one of these forces, maintaining this relationship. If this were not the case, a resultant couple would cause rotation. This principle is foundational in statics and has historical significance in the development of force analysis methods.
sfsy1
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/7673/lever.gif

I've come upon this phenomenon that as you shift the load left, or right, or anywhere along the lever, the intersection of the directions for the contact force due to the wall and the tension from the string will always be directly above the center of the load. I figured this out by accurate drawing.

However, is this always true? If Yes, how do you prove it? (i.e., formulas? theories? rules?)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's always true. There's a theorem in mechanics that says if three forces act on a body that is in static equilibrium, the lines of action of those three forces must intersect at a single point (or all be parallel). In your example, the weight of the load acts as one of those forces and its line of action is vertical. (I don't know if this theorem has a name--somebody must have been the first to notice it.)
 
thanks
 
If it were not so, there would be a resultant couple and 'something' would rotate. I think that the old system of Bow's (spelling) Notation was based on this fact. We did it a A level, I remember, and it was used for working out the forces in complicated, loaded frameworks in our 'statics' course.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top