Historical and Philosophical Foundations for Mathematics, Writing a Math Book

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the creation of a mathematics book that aims to provide historical and philosophical foundations leading up to calculus. Participants explore topics that could be included, express interest in the content, and suggest improvements or additional sections.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about skipping foundational topics like conics and geometric series, suggesting that readers may benefit from a recap or additional insights.
  • Another participant offers to review the book but requests a more secure link for downloading.
  • A suggestion is made to upload the document to Scribd for easier access, which is later followed by a link to the uploaded document.
  • Feedback includes a recommendation to add sections on basic algebra and geometry formulas, emphasizing their relevance to the introductory recap.
  • Another participant suggests explaining the motivation behind calculus as a generalization of linear problems to non-linear contexts.
  • Discussion includes the potential inclusion of mathematical structures like groups and vector spaces, highlighting their properties and relevance in various scenarios.
  • Orthogonality is mentioned as a significant concept, with an explanation of its importance in decomposing systems into independent entities, particularly in scientific applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of feedback and suggestions for enhancing the book. However, there is no consensus on specific content or structure, as multiple viewpoints and suggestions are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some suggestions depend on the author's intended audience and the depth of coverage for each topic. There are also unresolved questions about the inclusion of various mathematical concepts and their historical context.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in writing educational materials on mathematics, those looking for feedback on academic writing, or anyone exploring the historical and philosophical aspects of mathematical concepts.

Caramon
Messages
131
Reaction score
5
Hello,
Recently I've been attempting to put together a brief book on mathematics. The first section is short and introductory as I lead up into calculus. I kind of feel bad that I skipped over conics, geometric series, permutations and combinations, transformations of functions, and so many other topics... but I assume anyone who would be reading at this level already knows that and is possibly looking for a brief recap or some additional insight.

I'm by no means a professional mathematician and am finishing my undergraduate in Astrophysics so I am not a math major either. Please let me know if any information is erroneous or does not make sense, and all feedback is appreciated!

Here it is for download:
http://www.freefilehosting.net/historicalandphilosophicalfoundationsformathematics"

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd be happy to give your book a look-through, but I'm not downloading it from that site. If you want, post a link to a PDF or a more secure source.
 
Why not put the document on scribd? www.scribd.com
It's a very reliable site!
 
I found it very interesting you should update the thread when you add more to it. I would add a section on the basic formulas/equations in algebra II and Geometry. It really goes well with the recap you mentioned in your first post: Like Area,Perimeter and Volume for basic shapes. You could also go into detail on how these formulas were discovered.
 
A couple of suggestions

When talking about calculus, you could explain the motivation of trying to find different measures (like length, area, volume etc) in cases where you don't have straight lines: so basically its the generalization of linear problems to non-linear problems.

If you ever get into topics of certain mathematical structures (like say groups, vector spaces and so on), you could probably state the motivation for these is purely to find properties of these systems which are valuable since a lot of these abstract entities exist in many scenarios in different forms.

I guess if you are talking about orthogonality, you could mention that the importance of orthogonality whether it relates to vectors in euclidean geometry, or functions in Fourier transforms, is that essentially every item is essentially "independent" of every other item and modifying the value of one item (like say in a vector) won't change the others. So in essence orthogonality is an organized way to "decompose" any system into independent entities. This kind of "atomic analysis" let's you find ways to break down systems into simpler systems, and as a tool in science, you can see why it is particularly important.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K