History of Hamilton's principle

AI Thread Summary
Hamilton established that action is the stationary quantity for mechanical systems by generalizing Newton's laws of motion to arbitrary coordinates. He posited that virtual displacements from a particle's true path should not result in significant changes in energy, implying that the actual path minimizes action. This concept aligns with the idea that if a particle deviates from its expected trajectory, an external force must be influencing it. Hamilton's approach involved abstractly relating variations in the path to the energies acting on the system. Ultimately, his work laid the foundation for the principle of least action in classical mechanics.
Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
How did Hamilton work out that action is the stationary quantity for a mechanical system?

I've seen proofs that action is stationary, but it's unclear to me how Hamilton worked out that action as opposed to some other quantity should be stationary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
he attempted to generalise the Newton's laws of motion to arbitrary coordinates. bearing in mind that virtual displacements from the true path of the particle should do no work. i.e. if you throw a stone down a tower, and it takes route A, some other route B infinitesimally close to route A should not be very much different in energy to route A, and in fact changing the particles route should not interfere with the energies of the particle, and can be regarded as an External energy.
right so if you throw a tennis ball straight, you expect it to go straight, if it doesn't then there is some other force acting on it that changes its path. which basically Newton's law. Hamilton wrote this down in an abstract world, where he sought the variations of the path to be related to the energies put upon the system.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top