Holographic principle (I'm looking for a paper that I read)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the holographic principle, particularly focusing on the encoding of information in spacetime boundaries rather than within the volume of spacetime itself. Participants explore various interpretations and papers related to this concept, including references to specific authors and their contributions to the topic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a paper discussing information encoded on the boundaries of spacetime regions, mentioning three parts: a spacelike part for initial conditions, a timelike region, and another spacelike part for the "out" state.
  • Another participant references Juan Maldacena's work, linking it to the holographic principle.
  • A participant notes that the paper they are thinking of does not propose a single screen at infinity but multiple screens for each compact region.
  • There is a mention of Leonard Susskind's contributions to the holographic principle, highlighting its connection to string theories and quantum gravity.
  • One participant suggests an article by Oeckl from 2008 related to general boundary quantum field theory, expressing interest in its implications.
  • Another participant discusses the interpretation of functions on a timelike part of a boundary, questioning how these relate to the overall concept.
  • A later reply explores the dimensionality of boundaries, noting that a four-dimensional cylinder has a three-dimensional boundary that may be timelike.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations and references regarding the holographic principle, with no consensus on a specific paper or interpretation. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference different authors and papers, indicating a variety of interpretations and models related to the holographic principle. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of boundaries and their dimensional characteristics.

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
I read a paper a long time ago. And i forgot who wrote it. The author said that information was not encoded on space time but on the boundaries of regions of space time.
there was 3 parts on this boundaries.
a space like part (for the initial conditions) . another one for the "out" state. between them a time like region.
i think that they had the same dimension (2 or 3)
have you an idea? maybe Rovelli?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
It was neither him nor Verlinde. I read in the wiki spin foam article that spin networks are boundaries of spin foams. (i was still thinking of Rovelli).
 
Heidi said:
I read a paper a long time ago. And i forgot who wrote it. The author said that information was not encoded on space time but on the boundaries of regions of space time.
there was 3 parts on this boundaries.
a space like part (for the initial conditions) . another one for the "out" state. between them a time like region.
i think that they had the same dimension (2 or 3)
have you an idea? maybe Rovelli?
Reminds me of Leonard Susskind.

The holographic principle is a tenet of string theories and a supposed property of quantum gravity that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary to the region—such as a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon. First proposed by Gerard 't Hooft, it was given a precise string-theory interpretation by Leonard Susskind,[1] who combined his ideas with previous ones of 't Hooft and Charles Thorn.
 
You are right but in the paper i read there was not one screen at infinity for the universe but many screens. one for each compact region.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heidi
I think it was an old (2008) article written by Oeckl. General boundary QFT.
I will download it .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Does somebody read this article? I see how it is an extension of the standard quantum theory. But i do not see how to interpret the functions on a time like part of a boundary (the vertical region of the cylinder in the figure)
 
I see now. if take a 4 dimensional cylinder its boundary is 3 dimensional. it may be timelike:1 dimension for time and 2 for space (the screens)
they can wrap finite regions. It is the case with Verlinde screens.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K