Homomorphisms into an Algebraically Closed Field

Spartan Math
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Okay, so I'm trying to finish of a problem on integral closure and I am rather unsure if the following fact is true:

If L embeds into an algebraically closed field K and F is an algebraic extension of L, then it is possible to extend the embedding of L to F into K.

Now the case where F is a finite extension of L is true, but not quite so sure about the infinite case.

Thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spartan Math said:
Now the case where F is a finite extension of L is true, but not quite so sure about the infinite case.
The infinite case follows from the finite one by an application of Zorn's lemma.
 
and how exactly does one do that?
 
If you're not a Zorn's Lemma type, then maybe you're a transfinite induction type? Adjoin elements of F to L one at a time, and construct F --> K one bit at a time. Mutter something about well-orderings so that this makes sense.
 
Well, I'm very much a Zorn's Lemma type, if you will. I just wasn't exactly sure how to go about using it.
 
Well, you want to prove the existence of a map from an algebraic extension of L to K, and you already know particular instances. So most naïvely, it seems you'd want the objects of your poset to be such maps.

Then, you'd need an ordering relation to say when one object L-->E-->K is "bigger" than another object L-->F-->K.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top