Horizontal spring, mass and nonconstant friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a spring-mass system on a surface with nonconstant friction. The block is displaced from its equilibrium position and experiences varying friction as it moves. Participants suggest using the work-energy theorem to analyze the system, emphasizing the need for integration due to the changing forces. The key equations involve the spring constant, friction, and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding how friction affects the motion of the block.
Siune
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello! The problem is about spring with block attached to it. ( with spring constant = k) The system is on surface that has a friction μ increasing towards the direction of the blocks movement.

Block is pushed -0,1m ( to the left ) from the equilubrium position and then released. The block moves from the starting position, +0,3m to the right ( +0,2m from the equilubrium position) and stops. What is the spring constant k?

Homework Equations



Spring constant = k
Friction μ = 0,025 * x, increasing towards to the right.
Mass of the block = 2,7 kg

The Attempt at a Solution



The most problematic part for me is the friction not being constant.

I assume;

From -0,1 m to 0,0 m the Force due to the spring and Force due to the friction are in different directions.

From 0,0 m to 0,2 m the Force due to the spring and Force due to the friction are in same direction.

I'm not sure, but as the accelereation ain't constant ( due to the both forces depending on some variable) should I be using some definite integrals?

Or should I use some energy-theorem involving kinetic-energy and potential-energy?

Sincerely yours,
Siune

P.S I can draw a picture about the situation and scan it here, if the explanation ain't good enough. English isn't my native language. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Siune! :smile:
Siune said:
… should I use some energy-theorem involving kinetic-energy and potential-energy?

yes, use the work energy theorem (and a bit of integration) …

(KE + PE)initial - (KE + PE)final = work done by friction :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top