How AC Circuits Work: Explained for Beginners

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the workings of AC circuits, particularly how current flows from generators to household outlets and back. Participants explore concepts related to circuit completion, the role of transformers, and the nature of current flow in AC systems, with a focus on understanding the underlying principles rather than reaching definitive conclusions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a simplified model of AC circuit operation, mentioning the flow of electrons and the role of hot and neutral wires.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of electron flow, suggesting it is more accurate to think of electric fields and pressure in the wires.
  • Some participants emphasize that the neutral wire is typically grounded and does not return directly to the generator, complicating the understanding of circuit completion.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of a physical return path to the generator, with some arguing that the concept of a complete circuit differs in AC compared to DC.
  • Participants note that transformers are primarily for efficiency and do not alter the fundamental flow of current.
  • One participant raises the idea that there is no requirement for specific electrons to return to the generator, introducing concepts of magnetic and capacitive coupling.
  • There is mention of three-phase systems and how return currents are managed among the phases, with some participants expressing a desire to simplify the discussion to single-phase systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of current flow and circuit completion, with no consensus reached on the necessity of a physical return line to the generator. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of grounding and the role of transformers in AC circuits.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of AC circuits, particularly regarding the grounding of neutral wires and the behavior of current in relation to transformers. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on how AC circuits differ from DC circuits in terms of circuit completion.

KYPOWERLIFTER
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
This is a pitifully simplistic interrogatory, but here goes.

Is this roughly how an AC circuit works?:

An AC generator supplies an electron flow to start the circuit. These electrons then flow down a single wire to say a household fusebox/breaker. From there they flow to a wall plug and then which has two prongs, one 'hot' and one 'neutral'. Then the electrons pass through the 'hot' wire and through a device and return on a separate wire (although bundled in a cord with the hot wire) to the 'neutral' plug. The neutral plug wire then completes the circuit by going down a separate wire and eventually back to the AC generator. Parenthetically, I realize that the current switches polarity 60 times per second and that I have ignored transformers, capacitors, etc. But is this crudely correct?

Edit: it appears, after viewing this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/hsehld.html that I may have displayed further ignorance...

So, it's two 'hots' and a neutral that come into the home, with two 'hots' going to the breaker and the neutral going to a 'neutral tie in box'. It still appear from the diagram that the THREE wires go back to the AC supply generator? So, are the three wires not to be thought of as having electrons flowing to and from but more properly thought of as all with a back and forth electron flow? Or is it just the 'neutral' wire that completes the circuit? Convoluted, but I am confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly electrons don't really flow down the wire, it is the electric field that flows from the power station to you. Think of it as more like 'pressure' in the wire that is supplied, or like water waves - the waves travel for 100s of miles but an individual bit of water just goes up and down locally.

The neutral wire doesn't go back to the generator it is normally connected to the ground either at your house or at the last transformer. The power station is referenced to the same ground. Again you can think of it as changes in pressure.

Finally the split 110V two hot is a peculiarity of US wiring to allow you to also get 220V for heavy appliances, it just complicates the understanding.
 
I agree with mgb_phys. The two-hot wiring is probably not essential to learn as a first pass. But basically you are correct, current flows from the transformer, to one prong on the plug, through the device, to the other prong on the plug, and back to the transformer. It is generally more useful to think of "current" rather than specifically electrons. The drift velocity of the electrons is really small so the electrons themselves barely move.
 
First: Thank you both.

My issue is with visualizing a complete circuit. There must be some form of connection back to the generator, no matter how many transformers are involved? Correct? Or am I reading that electricity is generated at the generator and (simplified for thought) simply goes out and comes back with the 'switching' back and forth. I get the electric field but I don't get the notion of a complete circuit if there is none?
 
KYPOWERLIFTER said:
First: Thank you both.

My issue is with visualizing a complete circuit. There must be some form of connection back to the generator, no matter how many transformers are involved? Correct? Or am I reading that electricity is generated at the generator and (simplified for thought) simply goes out and comes back with the 'switching' back and forth. I get the electric field but I don't get the notion of a complete circuit if there is none?

Yes, the transformers are really irrelevant. The power generated at the generator flows through the load. The step-up and step-down transformers in the power distribution grid are mainly there just for power efficiency reasons.
 
A "complete circuit" does not necessarily mean that it is "physically" complete.

This is especially true with some AC circuits, as well as with some pulsed-DC circuits.
 
KYPOWERLIFTER said:
My issue is with visualizing a complete circuit. There must be some form of connection back to the generator, I get the electric field but I don't get the notion of a complete circuit if there is none?
It's a little confusing - there isn't the same complete circuit in an AC grid as a DC circuit.
The power is transmitted relative to earth, so at the power station one side of the generator is grounded and the other side connects to the high voltage lines (through some tranformers) at your house the neutral wire is connected to gorund and the live wire varies in a sine wave to +/-315V (Europe) or +/-155V (US).
 
KYPOWERLIFTER said:
There must be some form of connection back to the generator, no matter how many transformers are involved? Correct?
Yes.
 
And to elaborate...

There is no universal requirement that the specific electrons moving as a result of a "generator" be returned to that generator.
Magnetic and capacitive coupling comes to mind.
 
  • #10
  • #11
mgb_phys said:
I thought we agreed in this thread https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=280874 that there was no current through ground back to the power station and you should think purely in terms of potential?
I hadn't seen that thread, but you are correct as is the thread: there is no appreciable current through the ground back to the power station. The current back to the power station goes through the wires. The ground is just used to fix the reference potential and for various safety reasons.
 
  • #12
So you really have to think about all 3phases to understand where the return current goes?
 
  • #13
Hmm...

Whether there is current or no current is there a physically extant line that returns to the original source? I thought I was finally clear but after reading the last post, I am not. To not think in terms of a wire that tangibly exists is difficult. I have a grasp of Potential (house) and potential differences (the transformer). However if each step-off or group of stepoffs involves a grounded transformer then there is no need for a physical wire? I have read through the above thread and still am murky.

Simplified, of course: I thought that current goes out and has many transformers that do have complete loops for each user (current going out to an individual then looping back to a ground at the transformer). I thought that the current simply switches polarity back and forth thus alleviating the need for a return line... I was just assuming this occurred x three... :)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
mgb_phys said:
So you really have to think about all 3phases to understand where the return current goes?
Yes, but I was hoping to kind of gloss over it for the sake of simplicity and just talk about a single phase.

KYPOWERLIFTER said:
is there a physically extant line that returns to the original source?
Yes. Basically, power lines always come in sets of 3, the return current for each line is split between the other two lines. The Wikipedia page on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-phase_electric_power#Generation_and_distribution" has a very nice animation that really shows how the current flows in a simplified three-phase transmission scheme.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K