How accurate is the offset yield point theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the accuracy of the offset yield point theory, particularly the 0.2%-offset method used in material science. Participants explore its application in design, the variability of yield points in different materials, and methods for determining yield points in specific materials like DSC (Dispersion Strengthened Copper).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the 0.2%-offset method is widely accepted and considered accurate enough for comparative analysis, although actual material behavior may vary.
  • Others suggest that the true yield point can depend on factors such as material composition, processing, and testing methods.
  • A participant inquires about methods to test and find the yield point for specific materials, highlighting the complexity of the material in question (DSC).
  • There is a question regarding whether the offset yield point is simply a straight line shifted by 0.002 strain, which is confirmed by another participant.
  • Some participants note that in certain materials, the yield point may not be well defined, complicating the application of the 0.2% offset method.
  • One participant discusses the relationship between yield strength, elastic modulus, and the metallurgical state of materials, indicating that accuracy in yield point determination can depend on testing systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the accuracy and applicability of the offset yield point theory, with no consensus reached on its limitations or the best methods for determining yield points in various materials.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations mentioned include the variability of yield points based on material composition and processing, as well as the potential lack of a well-defined yield point in certain materials.

Engineering news on Phys.org
Since the 0.2%-offset method is widely used, it is considered accurate enough. Really this is used comparatively or as a proof that the material is suitable. In analyses, one would want as close actual behavior as possible. For example, one might use 0.001 (0.1%) offset.

The problem is that the true yield point could vary depending upon composition and processing, as well as testing method.

In design, most systems are designed to some fraction of yield so that there is adequate margin to permanent deformation and to allow for overload conditions which might produce high transient stresses.
 
is there any way to actually test and find the yield point for any material?

I am using a wire called DSC (Dispersion Strenghtened Copper). it starts off as a metal powder 99% copper, .5% alumin oxide, and the other .5% iron and lead. it also has a oxygen free copper cladding after the metal powder is drawn to a wire.
 
is the offset yield point just a straight line with the same slope but shift .002 strain over?
 
ECU0406 said:
is the offset yield point just a straight line with the same slope but shift .002 strain over?
Yes. The slope is Young's modulus or Elastic modulus, and represents a linear relationship between stress and strain, i.e.

\sigma\,=\,E\,\epsilon

http://www.mse.cornell.edu/courses/engri111/modulus.htm

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/permot3.html#c2

http://www.grantadesign.com/education/sciencenote.htm

http://www.uoregon.edu/~struct/courseware/461/461_lectures/461_lecture24/461_lecture24.html

http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Materials/Mechanical/Tensile.htm

This might be of use
http://www.shodor.org/~jingersoll/weave/tutorial/tutorial.html

One can measure up to the proportional limit.

In addition to material composition, the yield strength and to some degree, the elastic modulus is a function of the metallurgical state (dislocation density), i.e. how much residual cold-work is present. Fully recrystallized (fully annealed) materials have minimal dislocation density and have lower strength.

Accuracy depends upon one's testing and measuring systems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K