How Are Composites Used in the Biomedical Field and What Are Future Innovations?

AI Thread Summary
Composites in the biomedical field are primarily used for applications like bone repair and implants, leveraging their unique properties such as strength and biocompatibility. Innovations may include the development of bioactive composites that promote tissue regeneration and the use of biodegradable materials for temporary implants. The discussion raises questions about whether composites must be manmade or if natural composites can also be utilized effectively. Unique properties of composites, such as their tailored mechanical and biological characteristics, set them apart from non-composites. Future advancements are expected to enhance the functionality and integration of composites in medical applications.
MechaMZ
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Hello, anyone of you have any ideas for this question?
What are the use of composites in the biomedical field
and future new product of it.

your reply is greatly appreciated, thanks:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have any ideas about the use of composite materials in the biomedical field? Do they have to be manmade? Can they be ex-vivo? What property about composites (vs. non-composites) is unique or interesting?

example: Bone - a composite of hydroxyapatite and collagen.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top