How Are Eigenstates Determined for a Given Hamiltonian Matrix?

AI Thread Summary
Eigenstates for the given Hamiltonian matrix are determined by the linear combination of basis vectors expressed as |ψ^(k)⟩ = ∑ c_n^(k)|n⟩, where c_n^(k) = e^(in·2πk/3)/√3 for k = 1, 2, 3. For k = 1, this results in the specific vector |ψ^(1)⟩, which can be verified as an eigenstate by showing that H|ψ^(1)⟩ = -ħJ|ψ^(1)⟩. The derivation of |ψ^(1)⟩ is straightforward by substituting k=1 into the general expression. Understanding the representation as a column matrix aids in visualizing the eigenstate. The discussion clarifies the process of determining eigenstates from the Hamiltonian matrix.
Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Assume a Hilbert space with the basis vectors \left| 1 \right\rangle, \left| 2 \right\rangle and \left| 3 \right\rangle, and a Hamiltonian, which is described by the chosen basis as:
H=\hbar J\left( \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right),<br />
where J is a constant.

Now, show that the linear combination \left| {{\psi }^{\left( k \right)}} \right\rangle =\sum\nolimits_{n=1}^{3}{c_{n}^{\left( k \right)}\left| n \right\rangle }, where c_{n}^{\left( k \right)}={{e}^{in\cdot 2\pi k/3}}/\sqrt{3} with k = 1,2,3, is eigenstates for H.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been told that for k = 1, as an example, I should get:
H\left| {{\psi }^{\left( 1 \right)}} \right\rangle =\hbar J\left( \begin{matrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix}<br /> {{e}^{2\pi i/3}} \\<br /> {{e}^{4\pi i/3}} \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{matrix} \right)\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}<br />
And from this you see that it is an actual eigenstate, since I end up with:
H\left| {{\psi }^{\left( 1 \right)}} \right\rangle =-\hbar J\left| {{\psi }^{\left( 1 \right)}} \right\rangle

My question is, how did the guy, which I got this from, come up with the vector for \left| {{\psi }^{\left( 1 \right)}} \right\rangle.
I can't seem to figure that out :/Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Denver Dang said:
My question is, how did the guy, which I got this from, come up with the vector for \left| {{\psi }^{\left( 1 \right)}} \right\rangle.
I can't seem to figure that out :/Thanks in advance.

The expression for \left| {{\psi }^{\left( 1 \right)}} \right\rangle just comes from letting ##k=1## in \left| {{\psi }^{\left( k \right)}} \right\rangle =\sum\nolimits_{n=1}^{3}{c_{n}^{\left( k \right)}\left| n \right\rangle }

Did you try writing that out explicitly and then interpreting as a column matrix?
 
I just figured it out :)

Thank you.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top