How are Equations for Different Series Generated?

AdityaDev
Messages
527
Reaction score
33
Given series:1,2,5,12,25...
20150320_091819-1.jpg

How did they get :##T_n=a(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)+b(n-1)(n-2)+c(n-1)+d##

And for series like 3,7,13,21,...
they have given ##T_n=an^2+bn+c##

How do you get these equations?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AdityaDev said:
Given series:1,2,5,12,25...
View attachment 80673
How did they get :##T_n=a(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)+b(n-1)(n-2)+c(n-1)+d##

And for series like 3,7,13,21,...
Based on the image, this should be 1, 3, 7, 13, 21, ...
AdityaDev said:
they have given ##T_n=an^2+bn+c##

How do you get these equations?
If the first consecutive differences happened to all be the same constant, the solution would have been a linear (first-degree) polynomial. If the second differences turned out to be a constant (as in the sequence 1, 3, 7, 13, 21, ...), the solution would be a quadratic (second-degree) polynomial, which you could write as Tn = a(n - 1)(n - 2) + b(n - 1) + c.

In your problem, which involves the sequence 1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 46, ... the third differences are all 2, so the solution will be a cubic (third-degree) polynomial, which they write as ##T_n = a(n - 1)(n - 2)(n - 3) + b(n - 1)(n - 2) + c(n - 1) + d##
What they do after this is to solve for the coefficients a, b, c, and d, noting that T1 = 1, T2 = 2, T3 = 5, and T4 = 12. IOW, Tn is just the nth term in the sequence.

As an aside, 1, 3, 7, 13, 21, ... is a sequence of numbers, not a series. In a series, all the numbers are added together to produce a sum.

I'm pretty rusty on this stuff, as it has been many years since I did anything with difference equations. Nevertheless, I was able to get the coefficients a, b, c, and d, and was able to get the correct value for T5, so I think I'm on the right track.
 
Why is it T_n=a(n-1)(n-2).. why not ##T_n=a(n-4)(n-8)+b(n-25)+c##
 
If you ignore the way they've expressed it for the moment, you can still agree that it's a cubic, correct? It could just as easily be expanded and turned into the general cubic form
T_n=An^3+Bn^2+Cn+D
where A,B,C,D are likely going to be different constants to a,b,c,d but equate to the same cubic.

Now, why was that particular form chosen?

Well, picking n=1 gives us T_1=a(1-1)(1-2)(1-3)+b(1-1)(1-2)+c(1-1)+d. Now, notice that any (n-1) factor gives us 0, hence we end up with T_1=a*0+b*0+c*0+d=d so with this form, we can easily find d, as opposed to having the general cubic with coefficients A,B,C,D that I had shown above. In that case, T_1=A+B+C+D and we're hardly any closer to finding the solution.

So, we have T_1=d=1 and we've already knocked one of the coefficients out of the way. T_2 turns out to give us a constant as well by following a similar idea.
T_2=a(2-1)(2-2)(2-3)+b(2-1)(2-2)+c(2-1)+d
and again, notice that (n-2) factors would equal zero, hence we end up with T_2=a*0+b*0+c+d=c+d. But we already found d=1, so T_2=c+1=2 hence c=1. For n=3, you'll end up with just b,c,d and can solve for b easily since you know c,d.
 
  • Like
Likes AdityaDev
AdityaDev said:
Thank you @Mentallic

You're welcome, and good luck with your studies!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top