How are One-Dimensional Numbers Useful (Coupling Constants)

TheDemx27
Gold Member
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
How would it make any sense to use dimensionless numbers to represent physical things?

From wikipedia:
The coupling constant arises naturally in a quantum field theory. A special role is played in relativistic quantum theories by coupling constants which are dimensionless, i.e., are pure numbers.

If you are comparing the strength of forces, and you are using these numbers to do so, I would have thought that these numbers would represent units of - well, force.

Clearly I must be missing something.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The size of any constant with units is ambiguous. Is g=980 cm/sec^2 large or 0.0098 km/sec^2 small?
Expressed as a dimensionless number in 'natural' units, the electric charge of the electron is e^2=1/137 regardless of what units were used before it was made dimensionless, so the EM interaction is seen to be small.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top